[cisco-voip] PRI Issues

[Justin Steinberg]

when you say it only does this on "one gateway", what exactly do you mean?
do you mean that it only happens when the call comes inbound to you on a
specific gateway, or when you route the international call out a specific
gateway.

I suspect the 91 is being added in a translation pattern that is used to
route your inbound DIDs.

The easiest way to fix this would be to apply a specific transformation
pattern to your outgoing gateway PRI.   You could setup the transformation
pattern to 91XXXXXXXXXX and then set the calling party transformation mask
to XXXXXXXXXX.   If you haven't used transformation patterns before, create
a new partition, put the partition in a new CSS, put the new calling party
transformation in the partition.  Apply the CSS to the PRI in the Calling
Party Transformation Mask CSS, uncheck the 'inherit device pool' setting and
then reset the gateway.

Justin

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:45 PM, James Buchanan <jbuchanan at ctiusa.com>wrote:

> What does your route list/route group combination look like for the
> route pattern?
>
> James Buchanan | Senior Network Engineer | South Region | Presidio
> Networked Solutions
> 12 Cadillac Dr, Suite 130, Brentwood, TN 37027 | jbuchanan at presidio.com
> D: 615-866-5729 | F: 615-866-5781 | www.presidio.com
> <http://www.presidio.com>
> CCIE #25863, Voice
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Monica Hardy
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 4:08 PM
> To: Robert Kulagowski
> Cc: cisco-voip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI Issues
>
> No, just a basic MGCP router, nothing else.
>
> I was just on the phone with TAC again.
>
> Looking through all of these debugs it looks like I only have the issue
> when the call comes in and then back out the same gateway.  This is hard
> to reproduce and I think I am just going to have to take a downtime and
> be able to change everything and see what happens.
>
> -Monica
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Kulagowski [mailto:rkulagow at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 1:13 PM
> To: Monica Hardy
> Cc: cisco-voip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI Issues
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Monica Hardy <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I failed to mention with the 91 put in front of the Calling Party
> Number changes the plan
> >
> > to a Plan:ISDN, Type:National
> >
> >
> >
> > instead of a:
> >
> > Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
> >
> >
> >
> > I just don't see why and where that 91 is being added to the front of
> the Calling Number.
>
> Do you have a num-exp in your router configuration?
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100805/6350dcff/attachment.html>