[cisco-voip] vg224 port problem

[Ed Leatherman]

All SCCP

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:26 PM, <John.VanLaecke at ghd.com> wrote:

> have you got the service for mgcp or skinny assigned to the port ?
>
>
> Regards,
> *
> John Van Laecke **
> Network Administrator **
> **
> GHD**   **Accomplish **More** Together*
> T: 61 7 3316 4456 | M:0427 015 232 | V: 414456 | E: John.vanlaecke at ghd.com
> Level 2, 201 Charlotte Street QLD AUSTRALIA | *www.ghd.com.au*<http://www.ghd.com.au/_>
>
> *Water* <http://www.ghd.com/sectors/water/> | *Energy & Resources*<http://www.ghd.com/global/sectors/energy--resources/>|
> *Environment* <http://www.ghd.com/sectors/environment/> | *Property &
> Buildings* <http://www.ghd.com/global/sectors/property--buildings/> | *
> Transportation* <http://www.ghd.com/global/sectors/transportation/>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email
>
>
>  From: Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com> To:
> Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Date: 27/08/2010 11:54 PM Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 port problem Sent
> by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Just ran across this today:
>
> PSC-AVGW-9#sh stc dev sum
> ....
> 2/21       AN0C863BE468415 IS       IDLE           ALG     41006      CCM
> 2/22       AN0C863BE468416 OOS      UNREGISTERED   ALG     Not Avail  UNKN
> 2/23       AN0C863BE468417 IS       IDLE           ALG     41036      CCM
> ...
>
> Anyone know if 2/22 is indicative of a bad port, or is there some
> other reason it would go OOS? It's at a regional campus, so i'm still
> waiting on someone at the site to eyeball it and check cross-connects
> etc.
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> wrote:
> > i have had ports go bad. on more than one. make sure you have a spare
> RJ21
> > cable you can use to isolate the problem to the gateway and eliminate bad
> > pairs and cross connects. causes can be anything from faulty wiring to
> > lightning strikes. make sure you have good lightning arestors on all your
> > pairs.
> >
> > i typically wait until two or three ports go bad before returning it
> though.
> > it's not that uncommon.
> >
> > ---
> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> >                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: "Robert Shearrill" <rshearri at uchicago.edu>
> > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:10:16 AM
> > Subject: [cisco-voip] vg224 port problem
> >
> > Have anyone ever had a vg224 analog gateway port go bad. I have only
> battery
> > at the port No dial tone.. (Only on one port, the others appear to be
> > fine).  We have tried reseting port in Call Manager, shut and no shut on
> the
> > voice port in the analog gateway, reloading the analog gateway, and power
> > cycling the analog gateway. And none of these worked in restoring dial
> tone.
> >
> > Could this be just a bad port on the vg224.
> >
> > Has anyone experienced this. Is there other test that can be done in
> > troubleshooting this issue.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Robert
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _____________________
> This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MessageLabs.
>
>
> _____________________
> This email and all attachments are confidential. For further important
> information about emails sent to or from GHD or if you have received this
> email in error, please refer to http://www.ghd.com/emaildisclaimer.html .
> _____________________
> This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MessageLabs.
>



-- 
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100831/8d7c71b4/attachment.html>