[cisco-voip] CDR - blank originalCalledPartyNumber?

[Wes Sisk]

do you use a blank translation pattern for PLAR routing? that would 
cause initial blank pattern.

any endpoint going offhook, not entering digits, and encountering digit 
timeout would also cause a blank called party number.

Is there any consistency in the list of orig_devicename?

/Wes

Madziarczyk, Jonathan wrote:
>
> I'm looking over our CDR for the last few months and came upon 
> something confusing.
>
>  
>
> Normally I use the two fields
>
> callingPartyNumber
>
> originalCalledPartyNumber
>
> to check what calls were made and to whom.  However I have a huge 
> number of calls where originalCalledPartyNumber is blank.  
> Occasionally, finalCalledPartyNumber will have some digits in it (as 
> if the caller is attempting a call but gets interrupted).
>
>  
>
> Is this normal?  What could be causing this?
>
>  
>
> Thanks!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101207/a6beec29/attachment.html>