[cisco-voip] cisco telepresence and ccm

[Syed Khalid Ali]

thank you all. I think the customer after hearing this hopefully look for
alternatives :-)

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Matthew Saskin <msaskin at gmail.com> wrote:

> From my understanding it's purely a function of separation of
> infrastructure.  The majority of my customers with TelePresence installs
> have a 3rd party managing things end-to-end and providing SLA's which
> require non-shared administrative access to the environment.  That aside, it
> separates your TP infrastructure from IPT in terms of upgades, verification
> of compatibility, etc.  Much the same as UCCE typically being installed
> against a dedicated CM cluster.
>
> As for sizing, my largest customers (100+ TP endpoints) only have 2-3 node
> CUCM clusters supporting it.
>
> Matthew Saskin
> msaskin at gmail.com
> 203-253-9571
>
> July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run
> Please support the Leukemia & Lyphoma Society
> http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> What are the benefits to a separate cluster. I'm guessing easier to
>> manage if interfacing B2B?
>>
>> Trying to think of ways to justify a separate small cluster myself. A
>> cluster for that purpose wouldn't need much, right?
>>
>> Isolation from changes on the production voice system and vice versa?
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Nick Matthews <matthnick at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > If you don't have a CUCM cluster and you want telepresence, it is a
>> necessity.
>> >
>> > If you have a CUCM cluster and you want telepresence, it's still
>> > recommended but some designs have the TP and phones co-located on the
>> > same cluster.
>> >
>> >
>> > -nick
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Syed Khalid Ali
>> > <syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> group:
>> >> i am reading through the srnd for telepresence. Is call manager is a
>> MUST
>> >> have component? since most of the diagram show a 7975 connected with
>> Codec
>> >> Appliance and I am assuming the CCM is there?
>> >> Can any one point to a resource for better understanding!
>> >> --
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Syed Khalid Ali
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ed Leatherman
>>  _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


-- 
Thanks,
Syed Khalid Ali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100304/d18348c4/attachment.html>