[cisco-voip] VG224 running as SCCP vs MGCP

[Matthew Ballard]

If you also run/are planning on running standards based T.38 in your
environment (such as an IP based fax server), you have to be running
MGCP if you want interoperability.

 

Instead of running all ports as SCCP, you can run both SCCP and MGCP and
assign voice ports to SCCP, and modem/fax ports to MGCP.  The only
downside is that you have to track which port is which when configuring
UCM (as UCM will list all ports as if it were two different gateways).

 

Matthew

 

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Damisch
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 9:26 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] VG224 running as SCCP vs MGCP

 

If using analog phones on a VG224 and want to use hold, transfer, conf,
mwi, etc., I've usually setup the VG224 with SCCP instead of MGCP, but
this install will have faxes and modems on them and have heard of issues
doing this in the past.  Anyone know if there are still issues with
having faxes and modems on a SCCP VG224?

 

Thanks,

Kevin

 

________________________________

This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient,
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and delete or
destroy all copies and the original document.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100520/b215399a/attachment.html>