[cisco-voip] SNR and caller-id - cell phone doesn't show customers number but instead the office number

[Ted Nugent]

Historically we've just had the provider remove the screening table (aka
allow CPE to provide CLID) but if your hitting new legislation then I can
see SNR for MOST clients going into the toilet. Is q931 debug showing proper
CLID on the outbound leg? if so then and the provider refuses to work with
you then I agree with the sales people its totally useless. I've been lucky
enough not to have this be a problem yet on a PRI.


On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jason Aarons (US) <
jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:

>  Sales people are asking if the original calling party number can show up
> when using Mobility (SNR).  So call comes into office, office dials out up
> to 4 locations passing the office’s caller id to the cell phone.  Lots of
> telcos block what caller id can come out of your PRI (usually it’s your DIDs
> or the main BTN), a few will pass anything, in the case of this customer
> their telco limits what they can pass to main number/DIDs.
>
>
>
> So the feedback from the customer is that SNR is useless for sales people
> as they answer their cell phone only based upon Caller ID and now all calls
> from customers show the main office phone number in caller id
>
>
>
> Is there any feedback? Seems the FCC is enacting new legislation limiting
> what calling party numbers can be passed out, seems a few telemarkers have
> been forging their calling party number to get around call blocking
> equipment.
>
>
>
> https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2013151.pdf
>
> This didn’t work as telco is overwriting by policy.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> * Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you. *
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100526/2ff4994b/attachment.html>