[cisco-voip] Calling Party Transformation Mask based on Device Pool

[Mike Lydick]

I am using transformation Patterns at the gateway. Opted not to use the
device pool because we have different gw types at some locations and we can
reuse some   of the patterns and css. Probably not the same situation
exactly but it seems more scalable to apply explicitly at the gateway,
especially if you are using standard local route groups with consolidated
route patterns.

Best Regards,

Mike Lydick




On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Eric Butcher <Eric.Butcher at cdw.com> wrote:

> Yes, you can manipulate the calling party number based on route pattern or
> route list/group.  This should probably be done at the route group level if
> you are using local route groups.
>
>
> Eric Butcher
> Cisco Unified Communications Engineer
> CDW Professional Services
> 11711 N Meridian, Ste 225
> Carmel, IN  46032
>   317.569.4282 - IP Phone
>   765.744.1458 - Mobile
>   eric.butcher at cdw.com
> http://www.cdw.com/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 4:09 PM
> To: Ryan Ratliff; Dan Letkeman
> Cc: cisco-voip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Calling Party Transformation Mask based on Device
> Pool
>
> The problem with changing the External Mask is it shows up at the top of
> the phone, this can present problems if the Line Text Label doesn't have the
> did somewhere (don't you hate walking up to phone and can't figure out what
> the number is?).
>
>  Any chance we could get an External Mask Line Text Label  added?
>
> Wouldn't Route List for each office be their CITY-PSTN-RL, modify it there?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:37 PM
> To: Dan Letkeman
> Cc: cisco-voip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Calling Party Transformation Mask based on Device
> Pool
>
> What about setting the external phone number mask for each phone and using
> it on the route pattern?
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Oct 19, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Dan Letkeman wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to assign a different caller id to each of my remote
> offices?  I have device pools for each of them already and I was wondering
> if I can somehow assign a calling party transformation pattern to the device
> pool using CSS and Partitions?
>
> Or is there better way to accomplish this?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> -----------------------------------------
> Disclaimer:
>
> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and
> privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named
> above only.  If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified
> that you have received this communication in error and that any use or
> reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your
> computer. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101020/91ecceb2/attachment.html>