[cisco-voip] RFQ for SIP

[Bill]

What do you mean by this?

 

"Site redundancy in CUBE routers is a must if possible"

 

 

  _____  

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Craig Staffin
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 1:28 PM
To: Haas, Neal
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] RFQ for SIP

 

Neal,

Fax support T.38
G711 and G729 support
SIP TCP or UDP support
Allow for mid call codec negotiation
Site redundancy in CUBE routers is a must if possible

I would honestly take a look at Global Crossing.  I have worked with all of
the major carriers with SIP and so far they are the only ones that seem to
"get it" and have their act together.




On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Haas, Neal <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us> wrote:

We want to go to SIP instead of our PRI's, anyone have a RFQ that I can use
to base our RFQ on? Or have pointers to put into requirements?

 

I know that we will require at least 300 talk paths but most likely 450 talk
paths, we are running numbers to figure that out.

 

Thank you

 

Neal H

 


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101022/dc60e534/attachment.html>