[cisco-voip] Calling Number - Gen2 Vs Gen3 phones

Lelio Fulgenzi lelio at uoguelph.ca
Fri Oct 29 10:13:45 EDT 2010


I think they're gonna say the way to go is with normalization. Using the +. 

But wait, the older phones don't support the +. Or do they..... ??? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 



From: "Mike Lydick" <mike.lydick at gmail.com> 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:07:15 AM 
Subject: [cisco-voip] Calling Number - Gen2 Vs Gen3 phones 


We have setup Transformations(Calling party CSS in the device settings) to adjust calling number so the users will not have to edit dial 9 to return calls from missed and received calls. This works for 7940 and 7960 phones. On the 7970 phone the display gets the adjusted number but the call logs to not get updated number. I have tac case but they have not come back with anything significant. 



The only thing that I can see is the older phones seem to get the number into the logs as expected but the newer phones do not? 

Best Regards, 

Mike Lydick 



_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101029/0c55b362/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list