[cisco-voip] Virtualized subscriber

[Matthew Saskin]

Truth be told, the stability is there to just virtualize 100% and forget
about it.  I'm at the point with my client base where essentially 100% of
new projects are either greenfield on VMware/UCS or technology refreshes.
This is clients across all verticals and sizes, ranging from ~200 seat
retail call centers to 10K+ seat IPT and 5K+ seat UCCE implementations in
the finance/insurance space.

-matthew


On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> I would probably consider this so that my publisher is on real hardware
> and subscribers are on VMware sessions. The reason I say this is because of
> so many dependencies with VMware, network device and storage device, if
> anything happens to the shared storage, worse comes to worse, I just
> restore a pub and wait for a sync to complete.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 19, 2011, at 5:44 PM, "Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila" <
> jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com> wrote:
>
>  Thanks to everyone, sound like this is something worth exploring.
>
> ------------------------------
>  *From*: Mike Wilusz (miwilusz) <miwilusz at cisco.com>
> *To*: Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Sent*: Mon Dec 19 18:42:19 2011
> *Subject*: Re: [cisco-voip] Virtualized subscriber
>
>  Having a single CUCM cluster split between virtualized on UCS and
> running on MCS servers is supported.  As long as CUCM is installed on
> supported platforms, it can run in a hybrid appliance and virtualized
> configuration.
>
>  -mike
>
>   From: "Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila" <jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com>
> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:32:01 -0400
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Virtualized subscriber
>
>   We have a customer where we recently deployed a CUCM solution, They are
> running CUCM 8.5.1 on two MCS7825 I4 servers. This deployment is no more
> than a year old, 14 months tops. Now they are looking to virtualize their
> DC servers and deploy a DRS DC on one of their remote locations, It is too
> soon to change out those servers but I was wondering if it is possible to
> deploy a second subscriber which would run on one of the UCS servers or
> chassis they acquire. Can you have such a hybrid layout. I’m sure TAC will
> probably won’t support but this would be a better option than having them
> split the SUB/PUB via a 10MB WAN link that they have to the site.****
>
> ** **
>
> Jorge****
>
> ** **
>
> *Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila*
>
> *CCNA, CCNP-VOICE*
>
> *Senior Voice/Data Consultant*
>
> *Netxar Technologies*
>
> Tel-787-765-0058****
>
> Cel 787-688-8530****
>
> jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com****
>
> ** **
>   _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111219/ff02f279/attachment.html>