[cisco-voip] dial-peer E1 ISDN

Mon Feb 7 18:16:13 EST 2011

Looks like your configuration is missing 'unframed' keyword - which is
necessary for G.703 support. This may help:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1t/12_1t1/feature/guide/dtg703.html

Nikola

-------------------------------------------

Nikola Stojsin

PhD CCIE #12888

President

Network Makers LLC

110 Wall Street, 11th Floor

New York, NY 10005

(212) 709-8201

(212) 706-2986 (fax)

 <mailto:nikolas at networkmakers.com> nikolas at networkmakers.com

http://www.networkmakers.com

-------------------------------------------

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Just Kennie
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 5:59 PM
To: Paul
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] dial-peer E1 ISDN

Sorry not ISDN, HDLC encapsulation on the s0/2/0:15 I mean. I guess I just
explained the setup. Trying to route traffic through an E1 interface to a
remote destination that all !
I have written my present config out,and that all. Just need someone to help
me with this, since the interface doesnt use an IP address.

Cheers,
Idowu Kehinde
TEL: 2348024017748
BB:  30E8E5F9

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> wrote:

I'm not understanding your setup. If this is supposed to be ISDN PRI, where
is your PRI group? I've never heard or performed a G.703 ISDN setup..<?>

  _____  

From: Just Kennie <justkennie at gmail.com>

To: Joel Perez <tman701 at gmail.com>
Cc: Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>; ccieid1ot at gmail.com;
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Mon, February 7, 2011 1:00:44 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] dial-peer E1 ISDN

Cciedot1ot, I am using the E1 for voice, and its like an ISDN setup, that's
why there is no ipv4 address. its G.703.
Joel, I did what you said I should do...

controller E1 0/2/0
 framing NO-CRC4 
 channel-group 15 timeslots 1-31
 description G703.E1.Connection to customer
!
interface Serial0/2/0:15
 description G703.E1.Connection to customer
 bandwidth 2048
 no ip address
!
And see the below error when i want to map port to it.

dial-peer voice 1 pots
 destination-pattern 1000
MY_ROUTER(config-dial-peer)#port 0/2/0:15
                                                          ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

In my own opinion, I guess "port 0/2/0:15" is trying used when specifying an
FSX/FSO port, but here, I want to specify the E1 interface for the voice
traffic destined for 1000 on a remote router.

REALLY NEED HELP !!!

Cheers,
Idowu Kehinde
TEL: 2348024017748
BB:  30E8E5F9

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Joel Perez <tman701 at gmail.com> wrote:

If im understanding correctly what you are trying to do then you have a few
things wrong.

for E1's I use channel 15 for the D-channel:

 interface Serial0/2/0:15 

For the dial peers like it was pointed out it needs to be a POTS dial peer
and also needs to point to D channel 15.

port 0/2/0:15

"session target" is used to send to an IPv4 address.

Hope that helps,

Joel P

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Just Kennie <justkennie at gmail.com> wrote:

Paul/ccieidot1,

well I have a fsx voice-port of (but not in use)

voice-port 0/0/0
!         
voice-port 0/0/1
!         
voice-port 0/0/2
!         
voice-port 0/0/3
!
and an E1 interface of... (connected to remote router)

controller E1 0/2/0
 framing NO-CRC4 
 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-31
 !
 interface Serial0/2/0:0

 description G703.E1.Connection to Customer router

 bandwidth 2048
 no ip address

encap HDLC
!
I am using the E1 interface to connect to a remote router with E1 interface
too at the other end with above config

May challenge is, I want to configure a dial-peer that will route all my
voice traffic destined to 1000 through the E1 card, so i configure the
following....

dial-peer voice 1 pots
destination-pattern 21232
session target port 0/0/0:0
!

but saw the following error....

MY_ROUTER(config-dial-peer)#session target port 0/2/0:0              

^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

Also when I use port 0/2/0:0 as advised by ccieidot1, I receive the
following message..

MY_ROUTER(config-dial-peer)#port 0/2/0:0              
                                                             ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
!

Please assist, as what I want to achieve is to route all voice traffic
destined to 1000 at the remote site through the E1 interface.

Cheers,
Idowu Kehinde
TEL: 2348024017748
BB:  30E8E5F9

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> wrote:

What is the label on your voice-port?

I'm going to guess that your voice-port is also 0/2/0:0...I've never touched
an E1 so I am a little bit confused when I don't see :31 at the end instead
of the "0" you have there but..it looks like you're trying to send calls to
a voice port that doesn't exist and you're trying to use session target when
that's used for voip dial peers.

You're looking for

port 0/2/0:0 instead.

  _____  

From: Just Kennie <justkennie at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Mon, February 7, 2011 10:00:42 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] dial-peer E1 ISDN

Hi All,
I am trying to configure my E1 card for ISDN connectivity for voice traffic,
below is my config...

controller E1 0/2/0
 framing NO-CRC4 
 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-31
!
interface Serial0/2/0:0
 description G703.E1.Connection to Customer
 bandwidth 2048
 no ip address
encapp HDLC
!
Now I am trying to configure the Dial-peer, to forward 2123 calls through
the E1 ISDN interface
!
dial-peer voice 1 pots
destination-pattern 21232
session target port 0/0/0:0
! 
but its my 2811 voice gateway is not allowing the "session target port
0/0/0:0" command, please what should I do to forward my calls through the E1
ISDN interface.

Cheers,
Idowu Kehinde
TEL: 2348024017748
BB:  30E8E5F9

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list

cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110207/96508286/attachment.html>