[cisco-voip] C-series servers

[Nick Matthews]

This is true for the DAS on the C210.  On the B-series a HW failure would be
considerably easier than all other options.

-nick

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Bernhard Albler
<bernhard.albler at gmail.com>wrote:

> Generally I share the same sentiment as the other people on the thread:
> I consider UC on UCS to be a significant step forward. The virtualized
> deployment does add a lot of flexibility (even when used with directly
> attached storage) and installs are done quite a bit faster.
> Only drawback I see is some added complexity when doing a restore
> after a HW failure. since the VMWare Layer has to be taken care of as
> well.
>
> cheers
> bernhard
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110224/4f5170b4/attachment.html>