[cisco-voip] UC on UCS

[Matthew Saskin]

As far as I know,
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_Virtualization is the
gospel.

Supported hardware:
B200, M1 or M2
C200 M2 (limited capacity)
C210 M1 (no co-residency)
C210 M2

Things may run fine on B230's, but I wouldn't risk the potential for no TAC
support.

Matthew Saskin
msaskin at gmail.com
203-253-9571



On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Mike King <me at mpking.com> wrote:

> Quick question about UC on UCS.
> Is:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/solution_overview_c22-597556.html
> still the "word" on how UC on UCS is supported.
>
> Specifically:
>
> Server model: At this time, the only blade servers supported for Cisco
> Unified Communications are the Cisco UCS B200 M2 and B200 M1. Other
> blade-server models, such as the Cisco UCS B250 M1 or B250 M2 Extended
> Memory Blade Server, or Cisco UCS B440 M1 High-Performance Blade Server, are
> not supported at this time.
>
> My server group is purchasing a UCS system, and offered to foot the cost of
> the blades.  However, they are only buying the B230 blades.  All other
> requirements in the sheet are covered.
>
> So my questions are:
>
> From a TAC perspective, it's still the B200's or nothing (for support)?
>
> As a follow up, I know from the VMware compatiblity matrix that you can run
> 4.0 hosts in a 4.1 cluster.
> Has anyone ever done it?
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110306/015f25cf/attachment.html>