[cisco-voip] Voip Voice Recording software

[Scott Voll]

What Firmware on what model of Phone..... I believe we had some kind of
issue like this, and it' was the firmware on the phone.

back to the thread... we are currently using Call Rex.  Pretty nice
recording package.  API's could be documented better, but support has
helped us with that.

Calabrio (or should I say the OEM for Cisco) will not work with you if your
a cisco UCCx shop.  you have to buy Cisco.  Then you have to use TAC and
TAC calls Calabrio.  What  a Joke.

Also looked at the open source stuff that Lelio mentioned.  if you need
Cheap, I think it would work in a Pinch.  Here they like Support so it was
not an option.

Scott


On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Casper, Steven <SCASPER at mtb.com> wrote:

>  We are trying to set up a Nice Perform Call Recording environment and
> are running into problems. We have our system and all of our users set up
> as Nick describes and everything seems to works, then out of the blue the
> Call Manager seems to stop sending RTP from the BIB for various telephones.
> The fix is to unassociate and re-associate the users telephone to the
> NiceCTI application user. We have a TAC and a NICE case open but so far
> have not been able to resolve. Has anyone else that has deployed Nice
> Perform ran into this? Running CUCM 7.1.5.11900-6 7 and Nice Perform 3.2**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> Steve****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Samios
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 19, 2011 4:28 AM
>
> *To:* Rab; Matthew Berry
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Voip Voice Recording software****
>
>  ** **
>
> Forgot user steps; ****
>
> **-       **Grant recording LDAP user (or appuser if no LDAP bind) CTI
> permissions - enabled, allow call recording, monitor etc****
>
> **-       **Associate devices/DN to be recorded with the above user****
>
> ** **
>
> That’s pretty high level on how you set it up with CUCM - good luck!  ****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,****
>
> Nick****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Samios
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 19, 2011 8:21 PM
> *To:* Rab; Matthew Berry
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Voip Voice Recording software****
>
> ** **
>
> Active recording is what you’re referring to as ‘dual media forking’ from
> the handset – Built in Bridge in CUCM lingo.****
>
> ** **
>
> We use NICE active recording across 5 CUCM clusters works great - plus no
> need to SPAN the network!****
>
> ** **
>
> Pretty seamless to provision on the CUCM side; ****
>
> **-    **Setup recording profile for handsets, defined DP****
>
> **-    **Setup SIP Trunk(s) – or CUBE to demarc****
>
> **-    **Destination pattern to Recording RG/RL for profile to invoke****
>
> **-    **Set handsets to BiB ON and DN recording option/profile to app
> invoked (for active)****
>
> ** **
>
> See this for more detail;****
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/UC6.0.1/features_apps/CMmonrec.html
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Refer to the Monitoring and Recording section of Feature & Services guides
> for your CUCM version on how to configure - we use 6.1x flavours;****
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/6_1_1/ccmfeat/fsmr.html
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Rab
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 19, 2011 7:31 PM
> *To:* Matthew Berry
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Voip Voice Recording software****
>
> ** **
>
> Matt, could you share your experience and let us know why you wouldn't
> recommend Verint? ****
>
> ** **
>
> I have a major deployment coming up using their latest recording product
> with 'dual media forking' from the handsets! ****
>
> ** **
>
> Kinda worried now! :)****
>
>
> On 19 Nov 2011, at 01:11, Matthew Berry <matthew.berry at cdw.com> wrote:****
>
>  We've deployed a fair number of Calabrio (QM). In the past, I've seen
> Verint, but would not recommend it.****
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matthew Berry, CCIE #26721 (Voice)
> Sr. Unified Communications Engineer, CDW
> +1.763.592.5987  |  protocol.by/matthewberry ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Nov 18, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Erick wrote:****
>
> ** **
>
> I've used the Telrex product in the past but at the time (5years ago) it
> was a pain to configure.
>
> On Nov 18, 2011, at 5:21 PM, Leslie Meade <lmeade at salientnetworks.com>
> wrote:****
>
>   What is everyone using these days.. ****
>
>  ****
>
> Salient Service
> 760.930.2636, support at salientnetworks.com
> Request Line (moves adds and changes only)
> 760.930.2699, macs at salientnetworks.com****
>
>  _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
>  _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
> ** **
>
>  _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
>  ************************************
> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is
> intended solely for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended
> recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying,
> distributing or using any of the information contained in the
> transmission.  If you received this communication in error, please contact
> the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether
> electronic or hard copy.  This communication may contain nonpublic personal
> information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the
> Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  You may not directly or
> indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other than to
> provide the services for which you are receiving the information.
> There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.  The
> sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
> service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
> receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
> ************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111121/70e6f25b/attachment.html>