[cisco-voip] Phones-Life expectancy

[Garrett Skjelstad]

Why are you a member of this list if you hate ip phones so much? Do you install Cisco UCM and hundreds of VG248s?

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 6, 2011, at 22:51, "SouthEastTexasTelecom" <SETXTelecom at att.net> wrote:

> BUT lose the IP network and you are DEAD in the water….A writer for the Houston Chronicle (Ken Hoffman) has U Verse at his home..it went dead…ALL of it…he complained he could not call to complain his internet and TV was out…he dropped U Verse the next day…it was NOT due to a fiber cut
> 
>  
> 
> What happened to redundancy and NOT putting all your eggs in one basket???
> 
>  
> 
> Chris
> 
>  
> 
> From: Wellnitz, Erick A. [mailto:erick.wellnitz at kattenlaw.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 2:42 PM
> To: Rick Gilliam; SouthEast Texas Telecom; 'Nate VanMaren'; 'Mark Pratt'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Phones-Life expectancy
> 
>  
> 
> While these old systems may be rock solid (as can Cisco with a good design) We’ve replaced two Nortel and are in the process of replacing a Siemens/ROLM system.   
> 
>  
> 
> There are many compelling reasons to stay with an old system but there are also many compelling reasons to switch to your VoIP system of choice. 
> 
>  
> 
> Single wire to the desktop
> 
> Integration with Exchange and Outlook.
> 
> No gigantic rat’s nest of cross connects from 66 or 110 blocks.
> 
> XML Apps
> 
> The phones are no longer ‘dumb’ endpoints
> 
> The most adored feature from many of our end users is the BLF.
> 
> You can fit an entire VoIP solution in one rack opposed to the monstrosities these ‘old’ PBX systems are
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Honestly, 12 years is good for what the devices do.  Would any of you expect a 12 year lifespan from your smartphone?
> 
>  
> 
> .nether.net] On Behalf Of Rick Gilliam
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 1:09 PM
> To: SouthEast Texas Telecom; 'Nate VanMaren'; 'Mark Pratt'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phones-Life expectancy
> 
>  
> 
> Agreed Chris as I have ROLM single and Multi-nodes that approach the 30 year acid test and continue to chug right along like the day they were installed Sir.
> 
> Rick G
> 
>  
> 
> From: SouthEast Texas Telecom <SETXTELECOM at att.net>
> To: 'Nate VanMaren' <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org>; 'Mark Pratt' <Mark.Pratt at wageworks.com>; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 1:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phones-Life expectancy
> 
> Which is POOR….an Avaya,  ROLM or Nortel will last 15-20 years…POOR ROI!!!!
> 
>  
> 
> Chris
> 
>  
> 
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nate VanMaren
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 11:58 AM
> To: Mark Pratt; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phones-Life expectancy
> 
>  
> 
> A Cisco product manager for the some of the phones said they design the phones to last 10-12 years of normal use.
> 
>  
> 
> -Nate
> 
>  
> 
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Pratt
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 10:48 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Phones-Life expectancy
> 
>  
> 
> All,
> 
>  
> 
> Anyone got any input into average life expectancy of the 79XX series of phones?
> 
> We have had our 7960’s now for about 5 years and starting to see an upturn in the number of units experiencing failures of different types (and yes they are EOL).
> 
> Any input on newer models?
> 
> I have been googling but did not find any info. I know environment/users have a lot to do with it. Just trying to get a “average” if possible.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> ===========================================================
> CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue
> Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used
> by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
> ===========================================================
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive
> use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
> proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or 
> distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction.  Please notify
> the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original 
> message without making any copies.
> ===========================================================
> NOTIFICATION:  Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has
> elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).
> ===========================================================
>  
> 
> d to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).
> ===========================================================
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111007/19e22e36/attachment.html>