[cisco-voip] CM Admin AXL - question about updatePhone/Lines

[Stephen Welsh]

Hi Ed,

I have made device association updates to line appearences in the past, however I did it using a SQL update, and it worked well. Unfortunately I don't have access to that SQL statement at the moment, if I can track it down I'll post it.

But given the way AXL works, for this kind of change it will be a more complex operation than an SQL update, so if it was me I'd get started on that SQL statement ;)

Thanks

Stephen

________________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed Leatherman [ealeatherman at gmail.com]
Sent: 11 October 2011 13:23
To: Cisco VOIP
Subject: [cisco-voip] CM Admin AXL - question about updatePhone/Lines

Good morning,

I am working on a script to update line appearances on phones to
properly set the external phone number mask on each appearance on the
system where it is not currently set.

This is the first time i've worked with the AXL Admin interfaces, so
this is probably a very simple question.

I've noticed so far that when I send an update for a line appearance
on a phone that has multiple lines configured, it will properly update
the line i've specified but it will un-associate the other lines from
the phone. . for example
<updatePhone>
                                        <name>SEP88F0778994A1</name>
                                        <lines>
                                                <line>
                                                        <index>1</index>
                                                        <dirn>

<pattern>52003</pattern>

<routePartitionName>DP_WVU_Phones</routePartitionName>
                                                        </dirn>

<e164Mask>3042952003</e164Mask>
                                                </line>
                                        </lines>
</updatePhone>

This correctly sets e164 mask on the line appearance, but any other
appearances are removed from the phone. I suspect to make this work
correctly, I must also specify all the other line appearances, even if
i'm not going to make any changes to them, is this accurate? I will
try it this later today, would appreciate confirmation though. Any
options I can specify to avoid that?

I'm thinking this may be more simply done with a SQL query or two if
I'm going to have to explicitly list every line appearance.

Thanks!

--
Ed Leatherman
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip