[cisco-voip] Best match?????

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

My guess is because there are no country codes that start with 1 (just googled), the @ macro reduces the number of possible matches by at least two if not three digits, i.e. 1X or 1XX that the ! marker would give. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com> 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Cc: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:54:57 PM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Best match????? 

Correct.... that's why I'm scratching my head.... 


Scott 


On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi < lelio at uoguelph.ca > wrote: 




But Scott said it matches the @ based route pattern first, not the ! based route pattern. 

>From what I read in your response, you're saying it should match the ! based route pattern? 

I agree that it has something to do with the macro and how it expands only possible values, so, let's say area codes that only begin with 2-9, not 0-9. it must create a smaller number of international patterns, i.e. only country codes that are valid. 




From: "Wes Sisk" < wsisk at cisco.com > 
To: "Scott Voll" < svoll.voip at gmail.com > 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:12:08 PM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Best match????? 




@ is not a "pattern". It is a "macro" that expands out to many patterns. 

9.011! with the supplied number of digits is a 'closer match' than the international pattern added by the 9.@ macro. 

/Wes 

On Oct 26, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Scott Voll wrote: 

I have a CSS Lets call unresticted. 

inside unrestricted I have two partitions, lets call US and International. 

inside US I have a 9.@ route 

and inside International I have a 9.011! 

The CSS list International first. 

What does a number such as 9011 52 123 1234567 not match the international but rather the US 9.@? wouldn't 9.011! be a better match? 

Thanks 

Scott 
_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 


_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111026/ab85c362/attachment.html>