[cisco-voip] Best match?????

[Mike Thompson]

It shouldn't even be viable.  The @ represents NPA NXX format for NANP calls where N = a number 2-9

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Oct 26, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> My guess is because there are no country codes that start with 1 (just googled), the @ macro reduces the number of possible matches by at least two if not three digits, i.e. 1X or 1XX that the ! marker would give.
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
> 
> 
> From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:54:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Best match?????
> 
> Correct.... that's why I'm scratching my head....
> 
> Scott
> 
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> But Scott said it matches the @ based route pattern first, not the ! based route pattern.
> 
> From what I read in your response, you're saying it should match the ! based route pattern?
> 
> I agree that it has something to do with the macro and how it expands only possible values, so, let's say area codes that only begin with 2-9, not 0-9. it must create a smaller number of international patterns, i.e. only country codes that are valid.
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
> To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:12:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Best match?????
> 
> 
> @ is not a "pattern". It is a "macro" that expands out to many patterns.
> 
> 9.011! with the supplied number of digits is a 'closer match' than the international pattern added by the 9.@ macro.
> 
> /Wes
> 
> On Oct 26, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Scott Voll wrote:
> 
> I have a CSS Lets call unresticted.
> 
> inside unrestricted I have two partitions, lets call US and International.
> 
> inside US I have a 9.@ route
> 
> and inside International I have a 9.011!
> 
> The CSS list International first.
> 
> What does a number such as 9011 52 123 1234567 not match the international but rather the US 9.@?  wouldn't 9.011! be a better match?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111026/4ea049f3/attachment.html>