[cisco-voip] unity connection full mailboxes - notifying callers

[Erick Wellnitz]

What are other ramifications of disabling ISM?

We've only had one person so far with a full mailbox however, being a
lawfirm environment I don't want a managing partner to be notifed after the
fact that the associate they left a message for has a full mailbox and the
mesage could not be delivered.  I don't think our risk team will ever allow
us to enable UM/single inbox.


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) <chrward at cisco.com>wrote:

>  The only way to do this currently is to disable Identified Subscriber
> Messaging, this will treat all callers as external callers. This is not the
> first request for an ISM enhancement to this I have heard today, so I am
> already planning on bringing this back to the PMs.
>
>
>
> Out of curiosity, what are the reasons you are seeing for users having
> full mailboxes? In 10.0 we are finally adding a SMTP notification for
> mailbox quota violations if it’s an issue with Single Inbox users.
>
>
>
> +Chris
>
> TME - Unity Connection and MediaSense
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 03, 2013 1:51 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] unity connection full mailboxes - notifying
> callers
>
>
>
> Unity Connection 9.1
>
>
>
> I have the check box ticked to check for full mailbox for outside callers
> trying to leave a message.  Is there a way to do this for internal
> callers?    I could swear the system used to do this. We do get an
> undeliverable message and the VM left saying the message could not be left.
>
>
>
> We have some rather strong personalities who I don't want to hear from
> when thye are wasting thier time trying to leave messages for people with
> full mailboxes.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131203/68460272/attachment.html>