[cisco-voip] Cisco Voice AND M$ Lync

[Matt Slaga (AM)]

RCC is still supported, but not the main focus of either company.  CUCILync was basically a stop-gap until Cisco had Jabber ready.  Now it's the 'red-head stepchild' of both vendors.  Cisco's roadmap is no longer doing major improvements, and Microsoft only supported the APIs.

What a majority of my customers end up with is a hybrid.  Cisco does call center way better than Microsoft, and Microsoft does teleworkers far better than Cisco.



From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erick Wellnitz
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 2:36 PM
To: Brent Pollock
Cc: Cisco VoIP List
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Voice AND M$ Lync



I was under the impression that RCC is no longer supported.  Maybe I misunderstood.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Brent Pollock <hashtagvoip at gmail.com<mailto:hashtagvoip at gmail.com>> wrote:
That was part of point, I don't want to bash Lync. I never enjoy vendor bashing and it would be hypocritical of me to do so. I am just trying to find the best implementation path for the environment without sacrificing end user experience. I am also wanting to limit the complex while avoiding buggy integration. I have been part of some discussion about the future of RCC and CUCI-lync by Cisco, any evidence to suggest these may cease to exist?

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Gregory Wenzel <gwenzit at gmail.com<mailto:gwenzit at gmail.com>> wrote:
it was mentioned to me during the iselin NJ partner SE  Collaboration Bootcamp. I cant share the documents because of the agreement we have as a partner. I would show the benefits of Jabber rather than bash MS Lync.




On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Brent Pollock <hashtagvoip at gmail.com<mailto:hashtagvoip at gmail.com>> wrote:
Interesting, I missed that. Where can I find that statement?

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Gregory Wenzel <gwenzit at gmail.com<mailto:gwenzit at gmail.com>> wrote:
Cisco has stated not to go head to head with lync. show only the positives of Jabber because lync is a better product than Jabber.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Brent Pollock <hashtagvoip at gmail.com<mailto:hashtagvoip at gmail.com>> wrote:
Anyone out there fight the Lync vs Jabber battle? Currently working on a presentation on features of both as well as what can be delivered using both. Anyone care to share suggestions or reference material?

TIA

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



--
Greg Wenzel, CCNP Voice





--
Greg Wenzel, CCNP Voice



_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



itevomcid
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130322/b852e331/attachment.html>