[cisco-voip] UC on UCS
Omar
otgmcse at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 5 10:48:44 EDT 2013
Scott,
Sounds like you're looking for a co-residency doc? If so, there's some information on the Docwiki, however, not every 3rd party app can go through TRC. If this is a virtual environment, increasing vCPU and vRAM is supported by Cisco, so if you have any resources left over from your blades, I would say it's a go.
This is probably what you're looking for: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6884/products_tech_note09186a0080bbd913.shtml
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_Virtualization_Sizing_Guidelines#Application_Co-residency_Support_Policy
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMWare_Requirements#Resize_Virtual_Machine
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/UC_Virtualization_Supported_Hardware
From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 10:27 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] UC on UCS
Can someone point me to the correct documentation that says that either I CAN or I CAN'T run other 3rd party apps on the same blade as my UC stuff?
I've had conflicting reports but have no solid information on the support of this configuration.
One report I got said I could if I was using Nexus 1000v to support QoS.
Yet others have been it's not supported due to CPU and Ram concerns.
ultimately I want a TAC supported system, but need to factor in cost.
TIA
Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130905/3dd57121/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list