[cisco-voip] Forked Audio
Jon Shay
tucsonwireless at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 21:42:26 EDT 2015
We currently use both verint and higher ground. The latter is using both a
span port and built in bridge (two separate installs).
Verint is expensive and is frustrating to support since they love using
Java. But it works.
Higher ground easy to install and support but it depends on a thick client.
On Jun 12, 2015 4:29 PM, "Dave Goodwin" <dave.goodwin at december.net> wrote:
> Scott, while I did not work on that particular part of the engagement, a
> previous customer of mine used Telstrat. The phones were 79xx series
> running SIP firmware, and it also supported secure recording of SRTP
> streams. However, I can offer no comment or pros/cons of the software -
> other than that they got it to work with my assistance on the CUCM side. :-)
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Our Current call recording vendor just told me they only support SCCP
>> phones. is anyone else using a Forked audio call recording server that
>> supports SIP and Built in Bridge? we are migrating to 8861's which are SIP
>> phones.
>>
>> What Vendors are you using and do you have the pro's and con's you would
>> like to share?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> scott
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150612/c4426499/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list