[cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions
Dan Schmitt
customade806 at hotmail.com
Fri Oct 30 13:27:49 EDT 2015
Variphy Insight has the ability to remotely control endpoints. Furthermore you can perform Text Broadcast w Reply capabilities from the phones. Variphy will also allow you to run macros on those remote phones which will allow you to edit phone settings (delete ITL files, etc. in bulk remotely).
Dan
> From: cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
> Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 144, Issue 27
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:00:04 -0400
>
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise
> number mask (Barnett, Nick)
> 2. Whisper Coaching for CCX (Matthew Loraditch)
> 3. Re: I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise
> number mask (Scott Voll)
> 4. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Charles Goldsmith)
> 5. Re: I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise
> number mask (Barnett, Nick)
> 6. Re: I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise
> number mask (Ryan Ratliff (rratliff))
> 7. CME 9.1 shared line (Jeremy Rogers (AM))
> 8. Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Scott Voll)
> 9. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Walenta, Philip)
> 10. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Stephen Welsh)
> 11. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Charles Goldsmith)
> 12. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Nick Britt)
> 13. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Mike King)
> 14. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Jason Aarons (AM))
> 15. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Charles Goldsmith)
> 16. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Mike King)
> 17. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Charles Goldsmith)
> 18. Re: Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations? (Ryan Huff)
> 19. Caller ID (Lisa Notarianni)
> 20. Re: Caller ID (Matthew Loraditch)
> 21. Cisco hardware with built-in echo service (Sevana Oy)
> 22. Re: Remote Phone Control -- Opinions (Terry Oakley)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:35:26 +0000
> From: "Barnett, Nick" <Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com>
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate
> enterprise number mask
> Message-ID:
> <52587669999449b0aeddde69c4833249 at C1EML154.corp.alliance.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Here's the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our field offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to the field offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting speed dials to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This causes the call to trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount of training or bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing 9 to reach HQ for decades.
>
> I'm aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I'll get there, I just can't do it right now.
>
> My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use 11 digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXXXXXXXXXX. This gives a derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission accomplished... I think.
>
> Does this method cause any call processing issues? I'm slightly worried that it could raise processor usage... but I'm mostly just worried about it because it is "new" to me.
>
> Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/6d85b6b6/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:44:38 +0000
> From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Whisper Coaching for CCX
> Message-ID:
> <C75AF2AD9308C246AFBDDB994E3E29835AFC55C9 at PHANES.helion.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I know this isn't built in..
> I read that Compliance Recording has it but am having problems confirming.
> Any other solutions?
>
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
> Network Engineer
> Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
>
> Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/HelionTech> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home> | G+<https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/bfcaed9b/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:09:23 -0700
> From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> To: "Barnett, Nick" <Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate
> enterprise number mask
> Message-ID:
> <CAHgd+39XoahixKsfzMbEO-MuXvw3_k9o6crtuxcQSh2K08w2FQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> could you just use a translation pattern. 9130XXXXXXX translates to
> 130xxxxxxx.
>
> Scott
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick <
> Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com> wrote:
>
> > Here?s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our
> > field offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to
> > the field offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting
> > speed dials to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This
> > causes the call to trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount
> > of training or bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing
> > 9 to reach HQ for decades.
> >
> >
> >
> > I?m aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with
> > non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I?ll get there, I just
> > can?t do it right now.
> >
> >
> >
> > My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use
> > 11 digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXXXXXXXXXX. This gives a
> > derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission
> > accomplished? I think.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does this method cause any call processing issues? I?m slightly worried
> > that it could raise processor usage? but I?m mostly just worried about it
> > because it is ?new? to me.
> >
> >
> >
> > Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/fea8e292/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:13:40 -0500
> From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
> Message-ID:
> <CAGm7T+CmEuD3Us_z39E=yLrCyg2q3RX=K9Wvio=yLBg-b1c9Og at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I concur with Ryan, linux is the way to go. If you are trying to get
> backups to an offsite location or to a backup device, it can be a bit more
> challenging, but it can be done. I use shell scripts to copy the files
> where I need them to go once the backups are complete from the UC apps.
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and
> > FTP?
> >
> > I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have
> > to restart it and run my backups again.
> >
> > What have others had good success using?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/79b0e796/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:16:36 +0000
> From: "Barnett, Nick" <Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com>
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate
> enterprise number mask
> Message-ID:
> <417a4a4ee2d044d899f2fac011612976 at C1EML154.corp.alliance.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I sure could, but we are going to have over 1000 NPA-NXX combinations after everything is deployed. I was looking for a way to not have a ton of translations going on.
>
> From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:09 PM
> To: Barnett, Nick
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise number mask
>
> could you just use a translation pattern. 9130XXXXXXX translates to 130xxxxxxx.
>
> Scott
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick <Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com<mailto:Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com>> wrote:
> Here?s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our field offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to the field offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting speed dials to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This causes the call to trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount of training or bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing 9 to reach HQ for decades.
>
> I?m aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I?ll get there, I just can?t do it right now.
>
> My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use 11 digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXXXXXXXXXX. This gives a derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission accomplished? I think.
>
> Does this method cause any call processing issues? I?m slightly worried that it could raise processor usage? but I?m mostly just worried about it because it is ?new? to me.
>
> Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_cisco-2Dvoip&d=BQMFaQ&c=M-KQspD_LQogCbR-BWCHOaeDEPOhF8vWqHZTaiwxT3c&r=T9uVLZucbHG2NKKKzOrp-o5cpdReHj02PkJJsCVkgfwcv7S0R5lDeFJg2VRbiNih&m=paRhBsPV9F8cx4V4Suj3w3w0oN2AL6Vk-F2aL89dfXU&s=v-bYzIVjb_NyIJNhPSXZZCGYMsLM0Q2Bzdh64sFwJFE&e=>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/81d57d65/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:07:14 +0000
> From: "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <rratliff at cisco.com>
> To: "Barnett, Nick" <Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com>
> Cc: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate
> enterprise number mask
> Message-ID: <97BAC97A-5BC9-4EFF-8D08-8ECD69325A9B at cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I think this is a great use for the alternate enterprise number and it won?t cause any overhead with call processing.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Barnett, Nick <Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com<mailto:Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com>> wrote:
>
> I sure could, but we are going to have over 1000 NPA-NXX combinations after everything is deployed. I was looking for a way to not have a ton of translations going on.
>
> From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:09 PM
> To: Barnett, Nick
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise number mask
>
> could you just use a translation pattern. 9130XXXXXXX translates to 130xxxxxxx.
>
> Scott
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick <Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com<mailto:Nick.Barnett at countryfinancial.com>> wrote:
> Here?s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our field offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to the field offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting speed dials to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This causes the call to trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount of training or bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing 9 to reach HQ for decades.
>
> I?m aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I?ll get there, I just can?t do it right now.
>
> My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use 11 digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXXXXXXXXXX. This gives a derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission accomplished? I think.
>
> Does this method cause any call processing issues? I?m slightly worried that it could raise processor usage? but I?m mostly just worried about it because it is ?new? to me.
>
> Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_cisco-2Dvoip&d=BQMFaQ&c=M-KQspD_LQogCbR-BWCHOaeDEPOhF8vWqHZTaiwxT3c&r=T9uVLZucbHG2NKKKzOrp-o5cpdReHj02PkJJsCVkgfwcv7S0R5lDeFJg2VRbiNih&m=paRhBsPV9F8cx4V4Suj3w3w0oN2AL6Vk-F2aL89dfXU&s=v-bYzIVjb_NyIJNhPSXZZCGYMsLM0Q2Bzdh64sFwJFE&e=>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/94472437/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:36:18 +0000
> From: "Jeremy Rogers (AM)" <jeremy.rogers at dimensiondata.com>
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] CME 9.1 shared line
> Message-ID:
> <12653A76E0C67C4DA0C8CE32C504C4EC1F7C7D6B at usispsvexdb03.na.didata.local>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> I have a CME with several 9971 phones that have a shared line. Internally they use a 3 digit extension. Externally the calls hit an inbound translation to go from a 10 digit DID to the 3 digit extension. The issue is as follows:
>
> If I call from a cell phone to the DID, the call only rings on the SIP phone that has that DN as line 1.
> If I call internally to the 3 digit DN, it rings on all three phones.
>
> Is this normal behavior? I've tried searching but can't find any answers.
>
> Jeremy Rogers CCNA
> Advanced Technical consultant
> Advanced Solutions, Professional Services
> Dimension Data
> Office: +1.732.452.5238
> Mobile: +1.908.229.3474
> e-fax: +1.732.352.7891
> www.dimensiondata.com<http://www.dimensiondata.com/>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/b5a4c38f/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:51:25 -0700
> From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions
> Message-ID:
> <CAHgd+39E=nAir51MYd0K5n4UuxgW6_wuYQaXqH9tnxnQLjtvxg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?
>
> Do you like them?
>
> Pro's and Con's?
>
> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made
> their's free and not continuing support for new Models.
>
> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It
> seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a
> little xp'ish).
>
> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.
>
> TIA
>
> Scott
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/9c24e9c3/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:54:22 -0700
> From: "Walenta, Philip" <Philip.Walenta at Polycom.com>
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions
> Message-ID:
> <77CC199279E5D6428BD080E49D52C8B2A1B99AE876 at CRPMBOXPRD08.polycom.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I?ve been using Unified FX for quite some time now. The ability to see/manage groups of phones makes it a dream for me (I manage several labs, so I have a different use case).
>
> It makes certain tasks very easy (like putting wallpapers on phones). You can also use it to monitor audio and send audio (Play:AreYouThere.raw) etc.
>
> The interface is a little sparse, but very functional.
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 4:51 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions
>
> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?
>
> Do you like them?
>
> Pro's and Con's?
>
> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made their's free and not continuing support for new Models.
>
> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a little xp'ish).
>
> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.
>
> TIA
>
> Scott
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/feec8337/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:12:54 +0000
> From: Stephen Welsh <stephen.welsh at unifiedfx.com>
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions
> Message-ID: <AA216EC6-C577-4985-B1B5-59E5C1D33A78 at unifiedfx.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Okay, I can?t resit this one ;)
>
> I?m sure opinions will vary based on personal taste etc., but one key point, only PhoneView (http://www.unifiedfx.com) is Cisco Compatible (tested with 10.5, IVT testing for 11.0 will be complete shortly too) and used by Cisco themselves including the following:
>
> Cisco ACE team (internal Cisco IT that supports alpha clusters etc.)
> CCIE Collaboration Proctors to help remotely mark your pod configuration
> Cisco Devnet sandbox
> Cisco TAC globally
>
> I?m not claiming our software is flawless, but it is being used to manage Millions of IP Phones, so we do have a few happy customers ;)
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Stephen Welsh
> CTO
> UnifiedFX
>
> On 29 Oct 2015, at 21:51, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?
>
> Do you like them?
>
> Pro's and Con's?
>
> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made their's free and not continuing support for new Models.
>
> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a little xp'ish).
>
> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.
>
> TIA
>
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/af505b2c/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:41:55 -0500
> From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions
> Message-ID:
> <CAGm7T+AShp_oD9yuireQTbWzYJm5NLu5Se3DzYkdw39E4WNVCg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Variphy (variphy.com), and it comes with a lot of other very handy tools.
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?
> >
> > Do you like them?
> >
> > Pro's and Con's?
> >
> > We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made
> > their's free and not continuing support for new Models.
> >
> > We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It
> > seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a
> > little xp'ish).
> >
> > Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/5dbb5cea/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:55:03 +1100
> From: Nick Britt <nickolasjbritt at gmail.com>
> To: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
> Cc: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions
> Message-ID:
> <CAKsS23+B3e00hQYRrEyPP8TFiknPFv_BTUwfC98mxnLZOdXzBg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> +1 plus for unified fx saved my bacon numerous times ;-)
>
> On Friday, 30 October 2015, Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org> wrote:
>
> > Variphy (variphy.com), and it comes with a lot of other very handy tools.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com
> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','svoll.voip at gmail.com');>> wrote:
> >
> >> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?
> >>
> >> Do you like them?
> >>
> >> Pro's and Con's?
> >>
> >> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made
> >> their's free and not continuing support for new Models.
> >>
> >> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It
> >> seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a
> >> little xp'ish).
> >>
> >> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.
> >>
> >> TIA
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip at puck.nether.net');>
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> - Nick
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151030/40bd5065/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:36:13 -0400
> From: Mike King <me at mpking.com>
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
> Message-ID:
> <CANtPpk4zsBbap9gV2N713Zioo5k4GxLU9MBQMibkeLZa9duFfg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and
> > FTP?
> >
> > I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have
> > to restart it and run my backups again.
> >
> > What have others had good success using?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/1b6ff02d/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:54:40 +0000
> From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>
> To: Mike King <me at mpking.com>, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
> Message-ID:
> <2EB6888CFB98614EA7384BEB9AF8B3821F88BB84 at usispsvexdb03.na.didata.local>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server?.
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike King
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
>
>
> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>> wrote:
> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and FTP?
>
> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have to restart it and run my backups again.
>
> What have others had good success using?
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> itevomcid
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151030/dc62a6be/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:30:37 -0500
> From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
> To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>
> Cc: Mike King <me at mpking.com>, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>,
> "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
> Message-ID:
> <CAGm7T+CC=ZyrMoCk10xQbi7yc9wOjozj9brcyhMycYwfuJvECQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i
> know about
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
> jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com> wrote:
>
> > Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server?.
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> > Of *Mike King
> > *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM
> > *To:* Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> > *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and
> > FTP?
> >
> >
> >
> > I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have
> > to restart it and run my backups again.
> >
> >
> >
> > What have others had good success using?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > itevomcid
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/96805420/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:34:36 -0400
> From: Mike King <me at mpking.com>
> To: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
> Cc: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>, Scott Voll
> <svoll.voip at gmail.com>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
> Message-ID:
> <CANtPpk70j2zuAJ4j5p-rSROPggqMbAJyqbSAMHsXBoAQa+vRAQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> http://secure.nerdster.com.au/knowledgebase/10075/How-to-enable-SFTP-with-Filezilla-Server.html
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
> wrote:
>
> > same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i
> > know about
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
> > jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server?.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On
> >> Behalf Of *Mike King
> >> *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM
> >> *To:* Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> >> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and
> >> FTP?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have
> >> to restart it and run my backups again.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> What have others had good success using?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> itevomcid
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/99dbe6b7/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:44:03 -0500
> From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
> To: Mike King <me at mpking.com>
> Cc: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>, Scott Voll
> <svoll.voip at gmail.com>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
> Message-ID:
> <CAGm7T+B-30QXsGziz9DdPxAjke6x3a92Pp2KQ+qY6gKKewb2Jg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I don't think this is technically SFTP as we know it in the Cisco world.
> This is FTP-SSL/TLS. I have not tested it, but I don't think we can use it
> to backup our UC apps.
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Mike King <me at mpking.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > http://secure.nerdster.com.au/knowledgebase/10075/How-to-enable-SFTP-with-Filezilla-Server.html
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i
> >> know about
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
> >> jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server?.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On
> >>> Behalf Of *Mike King
> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM
> >>> *To:* Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> >>> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP
> >>> and FTP?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have
> >>> to restart it and run my backups again.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> What have others had good success using?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Scott
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> itevomcid
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151029/f650f5ce/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 01:48:09 +0000
> From: Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com>
> To: Mike King <me at mpking.com>
> Cc: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>,
> "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
> Message-ID:
> <BY1PR18MB012025E4D243B787BCA4E551C52F0 at BY1PR18MB0120.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> It is worth noting that SFTP and FTPS are completely different protocols.
>
> FTPS is FTP with a control channel and opens new connections for the data transfer. As it uses SSL, it requires a certificate.
>
> SFTP is an extension of SSH, so it usually uses only the SSH port for both data and control.
>
> SSH server installations generally have SFTP support but FTPS typically needs a supported FTP server.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Mike King <me at mpking.com<mailto:me at mpking.com>> wrote:
>
> http://secure.nerdster.com.au/knowledgebase/10075/How-to-enable-SFTP-with-Filezilla-Server.html
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org<mailto:wokka at justfamily.org>> wrote:
> same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i know about
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com<mailto:jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>> wrote:
> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server....
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of Mike King
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
>
>
> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>> wrote:
> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and FTP?
>
> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have to restart it and run my backups again.
>
> What have others had good success using?
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> itevomcid
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151030/ef754b17/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:28:33 +0000
> From: Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu>
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Caller ID
> Message-ID: <4D3DBFF0-5C03-46F0-A964-670A4468446C at scranton.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> In Call Manager ver 10.5, is there any way when a call comes in through a PRI (outside of the network) to a DID and then forwards to a Remote Destination configuration to pass the caller ID along instead of the default number associated with the PRI?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 20
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:46:01 +0000
> From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> To: Lisa Notarianni <lisa.notarianni at scranton.edu>,
> "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID
> Message-ID:
> <C75AF2AD9308C246AFBDDB994E3E29835AFC705A at PHANES.helion.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> It depends on where you are programming the outbound Caller ID. The redirecting CSS is the path used to get to the mobile so as long as nothing in that path sets the ID it will pass through.
> We use to program the CID directly on the MGCP PRI configs in CUCM. With mobility we moved it to the route patterns and then set up a separate set of partitions/rps just for mobility calls that didn't force the CID.
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
> Network Engineer
> Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
>
> Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lisa Notarianni
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 7:29 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Caller ID
>
> In Call Manager ver 10.5, is there any way when a call comes in through a PRI (outside of the network) to a DID and then forwards to a Remote Destination configuration to pass the caller ID along instead of the default number associated with the PRI?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 21
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:01:15 +0200
> From: Sevana Oy <sales at sevana.fi>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco hardware with built-in echo service
> Message-ID: <5c054876dddd3a05040695cad86acadd at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi,
>
> I heard there are Cisco phones with built-in echo service, do you know any
> by chance?
>
> Thanks,
> Amanda @ Sevana
> http://sevana.biz
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 22
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:06:53 -0600
> From: Terry Oakley <Terry.Oakley at rdc.ab.ca>
> To: 'Scott Voll' <svoll.voip at gmail.com>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions
> Message-ID:
> <C53F9D4DA50C854F90C655DBBC63D40C152EE0C5F6 at RDCEXMAIL1.RDCSRVCS.ADS>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I add to the UnifiedFX solution for remote phone control. We still are a strong Singlewire shop with their InformaCast product for notification, both informational and emergency. With the drop in support of the RemotePhone software it was very nice to find the UnifiedFX solution. Very happy with the results and they just keep adding to the offering so that even makes it better.
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
> Sent: October 29, 2015 3:51 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions
>
> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?
>
> Do you like them?
>
> Pro's and Con's?
>
> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made their's free and not continuing support for new Models.
>
> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series. I have a Demo of Uplinx. It seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a little xp'ish).
>
> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.
>
> TIA
>
> Scott
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151030/cba05d53/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 144, Issue 27
> *******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151030/4792e946/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list