[cisco-voip] IM&P 10.5(1) Version Confusion

[Anthony Holloway]

That makes sense, for sure.  Only that the installed version is -9 and my
ISO is -8.  So, it's the reverse of what I need.  If only we could
downgrade during an install.  ;)  Just kidding.

Again, my question is: why the two different base versions and does anyone
know what happened to -8?

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> If I recall correctly, you can apply a patch during installs. This should
> allow you to add a subscriber to a cluster with a different bootable ISO
> but the current patch level file available.
>
> I've done this on more than one occasion with CallManager.
>
> That being said, imp could be different.
>
> In addition I think there was a bug with early v9 files that wouldn't
> allow an install with upgrade so I was not able to test this out. I had to
> get a bootable ISO cut for me.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 17, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Anthony Holloway <
> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ryan.  This is not a typo on my part, I did mean -8 and -9
> respectively.
>
> My IM&P pub is installed with 10.5.1.10000-9, but I only have a bootable
> ISO for 10.5.1.10000-8 available to me at the moment.  So, I cannot build
> out my sub(s) at this time.
>
> However, my question is more like, what's up with the -8 and -9 anyway?
> Did something happen to the -8 base version?  Deferral?
>
> I'm working on getting a -9 bootable ISO at the moment.
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> While, like you, I can't account for 10.5.1.10000-8; it does seem that
>> 10.5.1.10000-9 would be available for your subscriber build (unless it was
>> a typo and you're looking for 10.5.1.10000-8).
>>
>>
>> = Ryan =
>>
>>
>>
>> Email: ryanthomashuff at outlook.com
>>
>> Spark: ryanthomashuff at outlook.com
>>
>> Twitter: @ryanthomashuff <http://twitter.com/ryanthomashuff>
>>
>> LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff <http://linkedin.com/in/ryanthomashuff>
>>
>> Web ryanthomashuff.com
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of
>> Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, January 17, 2016 11:20 AM
>> *To:* Anthony Holloway; Cisco VoIP Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P 10.5(1) Version Confusion
>>
>>
>> Try:
>> https://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=286269517&softwareid=282074312&release=10.5%282%29SU1&relind=AVAILABLE&rellifecycle=&reltype=latest
>>
>>
>> Not sure if when you login with your CCO it will go to the same place?
>> See the screen shot.
>>
>>
>> = Ryan =
>>
>>
>>
>> Email: ryanthomashuff at outlook.com
>>
>> Spark: ryanthomashuff at outlook.com
>>
>> Twitter: @ryanthomashuff <http://twitter.com/ryanthomashuff>
>>
>> LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff <http://linkedin.com/in/ryanthomashuff>
>>
>> Web ryanthomashuff.com
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of
>> Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, January 17, 2016 10:24 AM
>> *To:* Cisco VoIP Group
>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] IM&P 10.5(1) Version Confusion
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Does anyone know what happened to the following IM&P versions?
>>
>> 10.5.1.10000-8 and 10.5.1.10000-9
>>
>> As in, why are there two base versions?  I've not seen this in the past
>> that I can recall.
>>
>> I have an existing 10.5.1.10000-9 system, where I would like to build out
>> a new subscriber node, but the only access I have to a bootable ISO is
>> 10.5.1.10000-8.
>>
>> A quick google search confirms that people are talking about both
>> versions at different times, but no where could I find a comparison of the
>> two.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20160119/8f39ab68/attachment.html>