[cisco-voip] IM&P 10.5(1) Version Confusion

Tue Jan 19 15:16:02 EST 2016

Sorry to be so confusing.   Two points:

1) I already obtained a Bootable ISO for IM&P 10.5.1.10000-9 so I'm good to
go.  Don't worry about that.

2)  This is a post about: What the heck happened to version
10.5.1.10000-8?  Typically, when version numbers change, it's for one
reason, patching.  Well, if both 10.5.1.10000-8 and 10.5.1.10000-9 are base
10.5(1) versions, where is the patching in that?  I'm trying to further my
understand of Cisco's version numbering scheme, as one gripe I have out of
many, is trying to keep the two formats straight.  E.g., 10.5(1)SU1 is
10.5.1.11900-3 (or something like that).

Also, I know this list is a mix of Cisco partners and customers, so keep in
mind that I am speaking from a partner's point of view, where I go into a
lot of different environments and this one just happened to be one where an
IM&P node was built to 10.5.1.10000-9 but the ISO in the datastore was
10.5.1.10000-8.  So, I was scratching my head, because it didn't make any
sense how that ended up like that, and I was tasked with installing
additional IM&P nodes.

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> I guess I'm not clear. If you have a bootable -8 version, can you not boot
> with that, and then when prompted, say yes to in place upgrade, then point
> it to the -9 ISO file? That's what I've always done.
>
> I can see the UCSInstall_CUP_10.5.1.10000-9.sgn.iso is available on CCO.
>
> You should be able to do this to a subscriber node in a cluster where the
> publisher is already at "-9".
>
> I'm interested to know if this is an issue. Cause I've always assumed this
> would work.
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
>
> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
> lelio at uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Anthony Holloway" <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
> *To: *"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> *Cc: *"Ryan Huff" <ryanhuff at outlook.com>, "Cisco VoIP Group" <
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 19, 2016 1:58:28 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P 10.5(1) Version Confusion
>
> That makes sense, for sure.  Only that the installed version is -9 and my
> ISO is -8.  So, it's the reverse of what I need.  If only we could
> downgrade during an install.  ;)  Just kidding.
>
> Again, my question is: why the two different base versions and does anyone
> know what happened to -8?
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> If I recall correctly, you can apply a patch during installs. This should
>> allow you to add a subscriber to a cluster with a different bootable ISO
>> but the current patch level file available.
>>
>> I've done this on more than one occasion with CallManager.
>>
>> That being said, imp could be different.
>>
>> In addition I think there was a bug with early v9 files that wouldn't
>> allow an install with upgrade so I was not able to test this out. I had to
>> get a bootable ISO cut for me.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 17, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Anthony Holloway <
>> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Ryan.  This is not a typo on my part, I did mean -8 and -9
>> respectively.
>>
>> My IM&P pub is installed with 10.5.1.10000-9, but I only have a bootable
>> ISO for 10.5.1.10000-8 available to me at the moment.  So, I cannot build
>> out my sub(s) at this time.
>>
>> However, my question is more like, what's up with the -8 and -9 anyway?
>> Did something happen to the -8 base version?  Deferral?
>>
>> I'm working on getting a -9 bootable ISO at the moment.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>>> While, like you, I can't account for 10.5.1.10000-8; it does seem that
>>> 10.5.1.10000-9 would be available for your subscriber build (unless it was
>>> a typo and you're looking for 10.5.1.10000-8).
>>>
>>>
>>> = Ryan =
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Email: ryanthomashuff at outlook.com
>>>
>>> Spark: ryanthomashuff at outlook.com
>>>
>>> Twitter: @ryanthomashuff <http://twitter.com/ryanthomashuff>
>>>
>>> LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff <http://linkedin.com/in/ryanthomashuff>
>>>
>>> Web ryanthomashuff.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of
>>> Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, January 17, 2016 11:20 AM
>>> *To:* Anthony Holloway; Cisco VoIP Group
>>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P 10.5(1) Version Confusion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Try:
>>> https://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=286269517&softwareid=282074312&release=10.5%282%29SU1&relind=AVAILABLE&rellifecycle=&reltype=latest
>>>
>>>
>>> Not sure if when you login with your CCO it will go to the same place?
>>> See the screen shot.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> = Ryan =
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Email: ryanthomashuff at outlook.com
>>>
>>> Spark: ryanthomashuff at outlook.com
>>>
>>> Twitter: @ryanthomashuff <http://twitter.com/ryanthomashuff>
>>>
>>> LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff <http://linkedin.com/in/ryanthomashuff>
>>>
>>> Web ryanthomashuff.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of
>>> Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, January 17, 2016 10:24 AM
>>> *To:* Cisco VoIP Group
>>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] IM&P 10.5(1) Version Confusion
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know what happened to the following IM&P versions?
>>>
>>> 10.5.1.10000-8 and 10.5.1.10000-9
>>>
>>> As in, why are there two base versions?  I've not seen this in the past
>>> that I can recall.
>>>
>>> I have an existing 10.5.1.10000-9 system, where I would like to build
>>> out a new subscriber node, but the only access I have to a bootable ISO is
>>> 10.5.1.10000-8.
>>>
>>> A quick google search confirms that people are talking about both
>>> versions at different times, but no where could I find a comparison of the
>>> two.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20160119/1cdb46d1/attachment.html>