[cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

NateCCIE nateccie at gmail.com
Sat Dec 16 21:07:23 EST 2017


And that is why SAS is going to take over.  Systems management is easier to justify at larger scales. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 15, 2017, at 11:42 PM, Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Out of curiosity, how long had Tomcat been running before you restarted it?
> 
> This isn't at you Terry, but in general.
> 
> Companies will spend a lot of money getting systems in place, but then completely forget that technology has a life cycle; leading towards a better experience.  And no, I don't just mean upgrade to the latest shiny version.  I mean, efficiency, features, user experience, stability, scale, shorter MTTR.
> 
> Without being able to quantify it, I have seen more than a comfortable amount of environments without: a pre-production environment, proper analytics, proper change control, a good monitoring solution (emails from RTMT don't count), resource usage monitoring, a good backup strategy, vmtools up to date, and anything other than just MACD work being performed.
> 
> It's like there's this sole effort on "projects," and the old saying: "if isn't broke, don't fix it," wins again. We lose the chance to truly understand our systems, and therefore the chance to optimize them.
> 
> /rant
> 
> Disclaimer: Today was a long cutover, and I'm tired
> 
> PS Ryan amazes me too.
> 
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:32 PM Terry Oakley <Terry.Oakley at rdc.ab.ca> wrote:
>> Thank you again Ryan.   I think I found the issue.   One of the tests showed a problem with AXL services.  Restarted Tomcat and we appear to be much better.
>> 
>>  
>> From: Terry Oakley
>> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:29:31 PM
>> To: Ryan Huff
>> 
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve
>> Thanks Ryan.. .I will have a look tonight.. 
>> 
>> PS i don't know how you find all the time to respond to all of us but I am very thankful that you do.  😊
>> From: Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:26:53 PM
>> To: Terry Oakley
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve
>>  
>> Just based on that description alone, I’d say it might be possible you have some LAN congestion? 
>> Everything you’re talking about here is riding http/https.
>> 
>> - Any recent QoS policy changes?
>> 
>> - Is other non-UC web traffic slower than normal from those PCs?
>> 
>> - Run utils diagnose test on the CLI of each server and see if you find any goodies ...
>> 
>> -Ryan
>> 
>> On Dec 14, 2017, at 7:18 PM, Terry Oakley <Terry.Oakley at rdc.ab.ca> wrote:
>> 
>>> For the past week and a bit I have noticed a decline in UC (Call Manager) response time when editing/adding a device.   The message 'loading' stays on for 5 to 10 seconds or even longer.   Page refresh is also really slow.   In looking at RTMT the CPU/Memory/disk space are all around 50% or less with no apparent spikes.   Any suggestions on where this lag could be?
>>> 
>>> On another but may be related , a couple of our agents (but not all) both have had their phones restart while in use, and today both had their agent go into Reserved state for a couple of minutes before finally connecting and allowing them service.     Again any suggestions on where one would look would be appreciated.
>>> 
>>> UC 11.5 SU3
>>> UCCX 11.5
>>> IMP 11.5 SU3
>>> O365
>>> Unity Connection 11.5
>>> 
>>> Terry
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171216/c2d82842/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list