[cisco-voip] CCX and NTP

Brian Meade bmeade90 at vt.edu
Mon May 8 15:16:36 EDT 2017


It technically works.  I've done this a lot.  It's just Cisco isn't going
to help if you're having problems with CUCM Pub not working correctly as an
MTP master.

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
wrote:

> Interesting, all subs for CUCM are pointed to the pub and cannot be
> changed, wonder why UCCX and CUC cannot be pointed to it.
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Daniel Pagan <dpagan at fidelus.com> wrote:
>
>> Just adding my experience to this…
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree and can attest to the stratum-1 server caveat below. After some
>> time, the NTP client can get blocked and force you (the general “you”) to
>> update your entries in the near future. Of course multiple NTP entries can
>> be configured but if you’re doing proactive monitoring of syslog (or
>> specific syslog entries), or support multiple UC environments, it can get
>> rather annoying and time consuming.
>>
>>
>>
>> As for pointing UC apps to the UCM publisher… I opened a TAC case a while
>> back specifically to determine if this was officially supported. The idea
>> was to assigned all UC applications for a customer, per geographic region,
>> to their most local UCM publisher for NTP services. The customer wanted to
>> avoid IOS NTP servers, avoid using public NTP sources, and didn’t want to
>> spin up a small *NIX VM for this purpose either.
>>
>>
>>
>> Long story short, and after escalating to the CE’s lead, it was
>> determined that this configuration would not be supported, and any time
>> synchronization issues reported to TAC would first require the
>> configuration be modified before continuing forward.
>>
>>
>>
>> *“Cisco Call Manager might work properly as NTP Master but it is not
>> designed for that purpose or not even tested by developer. Publisher of
>> CUCM not supported to act as NTP Master [for non CUCM applications].”*
>>
>>
>>
>> We ended up using public NTP sources.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hope this helps
>>
>>
>>
>> - Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On
>> Behalf Of *Charles Goldsmith
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 8, 2017 10:53 AM
>> *To:* Haas, Neal <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us>
>> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CCX and NTP
>>
>>
>>
>> To expand on this, I would point to your voice gateways with everything
>> internal, then the voice gateways would either use an on-prem NTP server
>> that is radio sync'd or one that Neal has advised.  That way, everything is
>> synced together with the same source.
>>
>>
>>
>> For UCCX and other apps, I point them to the UCM pub and the pub points
>> to the voice gateways.
>>
>>
>>
>> I've seen a lot of people advise for pool.ntp.org, but that has bitten
>> me.  How often does an NTP process refresh from DNS?  I suspect only on
>> reboot or a restart of the NTP process.  I've seen too many NTP servers go
>> offline when using the pool addresses.  Because of that, I've been sticking
>> with .gov based NTP on the voice gateway.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ryan Huff, one thing about pointing to strata 1 servers, most of them
>> have restrictions from what I've seen, while they work, they could block
>> you for not being approved if you send too many requests.
>> http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Servers/StratumOneTimeServers has a
>> list, and while many have open access listed, if you look at the details,
>> they can still have restrictions.
>>
>>
>>
>> Just food for thought.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Haas, Neal <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us> wrote:
>>
>> Get an on-prem NTP server, if you cant spend the money, use:
>>
>>
>>
>> time.nist.gov     global address for all servers       Multiple locations
>>
>> utcnist.colorado.edu      128.138.140.44  University of Colorado, Boulder
>>
>> utcnist2.colorado.edu    128.138.141.172                University of
>> Colorado, Boulder
>>
>> time-nw.nist.gov             131.107.13.100  Microsoft, Redmond,
>> Washington
>>
>>
>>
>> Really, anything with a GOV, or EDU should be good.
>>
>>
>>
>> By the way, you should NEVER, EVER, EVER (can’t stress this enough) a
>> Windows Based NTP.  Every place that I have went into and removed a Windows
>> Time server, everything has worked better! Windows just cant do time. I
>> went into a business with windows NTP, and the guy was checking time from
>> about 100 NTP servers, his time was off by three minutes. Took it down to 3
>> and everything started to work.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank You,
>>
>>
>>
>> Neal Haas
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On
>> Behalf Of *Ben Amick
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 8, 2017 7:12 AM
>> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CCX and NTP
>>
>>
>>
>> What do you guys use for NTP on your CCX hosts? I’ve been informed by TAC
>> that “CCX does not support Windows based NTP” so I was thinking about just
>> pointing NTP towards my CCM hosts – is that a valid scenario? I figure that
>> since CCM is pretty much authoritative on everything for CCX as it is it
>> wouldn’t be a problem?
>>
>>
>>
>> *Ben Amick*
>>
>> Telecom Analyst
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the
>> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
>> that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
>> applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient
>> or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
>> you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or
>> hard copy. Thank you
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170508/9eb920b4/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list