[cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

[Tim Smith]

Yikes.. it was menu driven..
I put my first one in and it had 48 x faxes on it…
48 faxes that all seemed to have different volume levels which couldn’t be adjusted on the fax, and it caused transmission errors..

So about 200 x Telstra FOLDS tests later – and manually adjusting the gain on each port via the menu.
Prefer IOS 😊


From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, 4 April 2019 at 2:07 pm
To: NateCCIE <nateccie at gmail.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

Apparently I have been living under a rock for 13 years.  I didn't know the VG248 wasn't IOS based, because, well, I've never worked with one.  So, what is it then?

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:03 PM NateCCIE <nateccie at gmail.com<mailto:nateccie at gmail.com>> wrote:
VG248 was the best one ever made by Cisco.  Not IOS based made the thing
super stable and easy to configure/manage.  Makes me sad when ever I think
about it.



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Lelio
Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:35 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>)
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules


I see the VG350 has pretty much been EOL'd (February 29, 2024) in favour of
ISR4K with high density voice service modules or a VG450 (which is ISR4K
based).

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/vg-
series-gateways/eos-eol-notice-c51-741597.html

Anybody know if the VG310 and VG320 is going that path? It would be hard to
assume so, since the VG400s are very low density and look like they're
replacing the VG202/VG204.

I can't imagine having to fork out for a ISR4K for 24 or 48 analog ports.

Thoughts?


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G
2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca><mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs><http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram,
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190404/317126a6/attachment.html>