[cisco-voip] Cisco moth-balling CUE - Is Connection SRSV the answer?

[Charles Goldsmith]

I find myself swapping between CUC and CUCXN, depending on who I'm talking
to and context, and if it's someone not in Collaboration, Spelling it out.
Seems CUCM is universal around technical people, but the others aren't so
much.

Unity...  *shudders*

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 1:01 PM Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:

> "CUCX"
>
> I find it interesting the different ways we Engineers write that.  I have
> also seen CUXN, CUCXN and CUC.  I'm team CUC, but I think we can all
> agree that simply "Unity" is wrong.
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:45 PM Eric Pedersen <PedersenE at bennettjones.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, from what I remember it can operate while CUCM and CUCX are both up.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> *On Behalf Of *Lelio
>> Fulgenzi
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 4, 2020 9:37 AM
>> *To:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net) <
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco moth-balling CUE - Is Connection SRSV
>> the answer?
>>
>>
>>
>> Do you know if SRSV can operate while CUCM is up?
>>
>>
>>
>> The great thing about CUE, is that it operated while CUCM was up.
>> Completely independent of Unity Connection.
>>
>>
>>
>> This means, I could schedule downtime for Connection and have an almost
>> fully operational AA working.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Eric Pedersen <PedersenE at bennettjones.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 4, 2020 11:35 AM
>> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>; voyp list, cisco-voip (
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net) <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>> *Subject:* RE: Cisco moth-balling CUE - Is Connection SRSV the answer?
>>
>>
>>
>> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the University of
>> Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
>> sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails
>> to IThelp at uoguelph.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> I used SRSV a while ago for one of our remote sites. I found it much
>> simpler to get up and running than CUE and you can use your centralized
>> Exchange.  IIRC you can send your voicemail pilot back to the gateway SRSV
>> is registered to so all calls go to it. But it's been a really long time…
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> *On Behalf Of *Lelio
>> Fulgenzi
>> *Sent:* Sunday, May 3, 2020 11:38 AM
>> *To:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net) <
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Cisco moth-balling CUE - Is Connection SRSV the
>> answer?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Looks like Cisco is moth-balling CUE. I liked that product. I’ll miss it.
>>
>>
>>
>> It looks like Connection SRSV is the answer. Although I’m not sure it
>> will offer everything we used (and planned to use) CUE for. For example,
>> our voicemail ports forwarded to CUE which was always registered to CUCM.
>> This way, calls would continue to work. It’s looking like SRSV will only
>> work if the router is in SRST mode and all phones are registered to SRST.
>>
>>
>>
>> Has anyone successfully deployed SRSV? How about using it during
>> voicemail maintenance?
>>
>>
>>
>> Lelio
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bennett Jones is committed to mitigating the spread of COVID-19. We have
>> transitioned to a remote work environment and continue to provide complete
>> and uninterrupted service to our clients. Visit our COVID-19 Resource
>> Centre (https://www.bennettjones.com/COVID-19) for timely legal updates.
>>
>> The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged
>> subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact
>> the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication, e-mail
>> communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized parties.
>> If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please notify us
>> at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such notification, your
>> consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to communicate by e-mail,
>> we will not take any additional security measures (such as encryption)
>> unless specifically requested.
>>
>> If you no longer wish to receive commercial messages, you can unsubscribe
>> by accessing this link: http://www.bennettjones.com/unsubscribe
>>
>>
>> Bennett Jones is committed to mitigating the spread of COVID-19. We have
>> transitioned to a remote work environment and continue to provide complete
>> and uninterrupted service to our clients. Visit our COVID-19 Resource
>> Centre (https://www.bennettjones.com/COVID-19) for timely legal updates.
>>
>> The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged
>> subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact
>> the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication, e-mail
>> communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized parties.
>> If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please notify us
>> at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such notification, your
>> consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to communicate by e-mail,
>> we will not take any additional security measures (such as encryption)
>> unless specifically requested.
>>
>> If you no longer wish to receive commercial messages, you can unsubscribe
>> by accessing this link: http://www.bennettjones.com/unsubscribe
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20200504/8d15dca7/attachment.htm>