[f-nsp] Significan Differents Between NetIron MLX dam NetIron XMR
Lazuardi Nasution
mrxlazuardin at gmail.com
Sun Dec 2 13:36:38 EST 2007
Very helpful opinion. Any suggestion of small scale MPLS switch/router
which has Multi-VRF and NAT capability ? We just have small number of
customers, so we just need small number of virtual routers.
Thank you.
> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:46:11 -0500
> From: Robert Boyle <robert at tellurian.com>
> Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Significan Differents Between NetIron MLX dam
> NetIron XMR
> To: "Lazuardi Nasution" <mrxlazuardin at gmail.com>,
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <1196613972_83684 at mail1.tellurian.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> At 11:11 AM 12/2/2007, Lazuardi Nasution wrote:
> >I couldn't found any significan differents between NetIron MLX dam
> >NetIron XMR. It seems very identic on specification and with very
> >little different of price. Any idea of the different ?
>
> There isn't much difference in price and they run the same software
> images. However, in my personal opinion, you should buy the XMR. It
> will hold twice the number of routes and although we are at over 250k
> Internet routes today and the MLX will hold 512k (approx dependent on
> how you slice up MPLS/IPv4/IPv6) routes and the XMR will hold approx
> 1 million routes, the XMR will be usable for a longer time. This is
> due to a larger CAM on all line cards and more RAM in the management
> modules. You cannot upgrade an MLX to be an XMR. We have the XMRs and
> have been very happy with them. We evaluated an MLX box in the
> beginning, but bought the XMR.
>
> -Robert
More information about the foundry-nsp
mailing list