[f-nsp] MPLS without P Router

[Lazuardi Nasution]

Hi Asoka,

Your file is very good representative of my topology design. Can we
use it not only for VLL and BGP/MPLS which is using VRF ?

Any comparison about VPLS and BGP/MPLS ? I mean on NetIron MLX/XMR. I
think we can compare them about performance and scalability based on
how much VPN clouds can be subscribed.

Best regards,

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Asoka De Saram <adesaram at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Yes, take a look at the attached solution guide. (P) routers are not required at all. (PE) routers do all the heavy lifting. All routers in this design are (PE) routers connected in a L2 metro ring.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Lazuardi Nasution <mrxlazuardin at gmail.com>
> To: foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2008 2:22:52 PM
> Subject: [f-nsp] MPLS without P Router
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone has experience with deploying MPLS but without putting any
> Provider (P) Router ? Let assume that there are only small numbers of
> NetIron MLX/XMR Routers act as Provider Edge (PE) Router and which are
> connected as a L2 Ring.
>
> Best regards,