[f-nsp] Difference between'ip address' and VE IP address? ServerIron XL
Drew Weaver
drew.weaver at thenap.com
Fri Oct 15 11:51:32 EDT 2010
ServerIRON XL 07.4.01mT12
In a config for an older load balancer I have:
vlan 5 by port
untagged ethe 1 to 8
router-interface ve 4
ip address 192.168.1.94 255.255.255.224
then:
interface ve 4
ip address 192.168.1.67 255.255.255.224
I notice at seemingly random intervals when I am having nagios ping 192.168.1.67 I get random spikes of latency:
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=61
Reply from 192.168.1.67: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=61
and if I nail a ping on 192.168.1.94 during the same time of latency it stays at <1ms.
#1 Are these routed different, use different resources to respond to pings?
#2 Is this a problem?
#3 I can't even remember why I have the VE in there like that it has been years since we set this up but it seems extraneous. I am sure there is some reason I did this originally but now I am totally drawing a blank.
Any thoughts?
-Drew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20101015/50126813/attachment.html>
More information about the foundry-nsp
mailing list