[f-nsp] Link Aggregation between Foundry and Cisco
Joseph Hardeman
jwhardeman at gmail.com
Fri Jan 7 20:28:54 EST 2011
Hey Mike,
You wouldn't happen to know what version of code or when they started
supporting dynamic LACP over tagged links would be would you?
Joe
On 1/7/2011 8:15 PM, Mike Allen wrote:
> Joe, Scott is likely on the right track. Early versions of B4000/8000
> code did not support dynamic LACP over tagged links. Given that, your
> options are upgrading to a newer release, or use static trunks as you
> mentioned. If you do the upgrade and then do LACP over a tagged port,
> make sure you use a LACP key. Other than that, it should work just
> fine between vendors. Hope that helps.
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Joseph Hardeman <jwhardeman at gmail.com
> <mailto:jwhardeman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/7/2011 7:36 PM, Big Wave Dave wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Joseph
> Hardeman<jwhardeman at gmail.com <mailto:jwhardeman at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am having a bit of an issue, I have gotten a pair of
> Cisco 6509's with the
> SUP-720 engines. I am trying to configure link
> aggregation between one of
> these to a BI4000 I have to test with before we put them
> into production and
> connect them to our BI8000's and fight this problem then.
> I have been
> searching and looking at the docs I have. The
> configuration I have on the
> Cisco's allow them to talk over the port channels between
> each other with no
> issues.
>
> I can setup the command "link-aggregation active" on port
> "ethe 1/5" with no
> issues it takes the command, but when I go to add a test
> VLAN on to that
> port I get the following error message:
>
> error - some ports are running LACP and can not be tagged
> ports.
>
> Here is the command I am running on the BI:
>
> test(config)#int e 1/5
> test(config-if-e1000-1/5)#link-aggregate configure key 10000
> test(config-if-e1000-1/5)#link-aggregate active
> test(config-if-e1000-1/5)#exit
> test(config)#vlan 14
> test(config-vlan-14)#tagged e 1/5
> error - some ports are running LACP and can not be tagged
> ports.
> test(config-vlan-14)#end
>
> Here is the output of sh int e 1/5"
> GigabitEthernet1/5 is up, line protocol is up
> Hardware is GigabitEthernet, address is 00e0.52cc.3b04
> (bia 00e0.52cc.3b04)
> Configured speed 1Gbit, actual 1Gbit, configured duplex
> fdx, actual fdx
> Member of L2 VLAN ID 1, port is untagged, port state is
> BLOCKING
> STP configured to ON, priority is level0, flow control
> disabled
> mirror disabled, monitor disabled
> Not member of any active trunks
> Not member of any configured trunks
> No port name
> MTU 1518 bytes, encapsulation ethernet
> 300 second input rate: 40104 bits/sec, 72 packets/sec,
> 0.00% utilization
> 300 second output rate: 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec, 0.00%
> utilization
> 899789 packets input, 62419802 bytes, 0 no buffer
> Received 372 broadcasts, 899417 multicasts, 0 unicasts
> 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 ignored
> 0 runts, 0 giants, DMA received 899786 packets
> 0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
>
> > Transmitted 0 broadcasts, 0 multicasts, 0 unicasts
>
> 0 output errors, 0 collisions, DMA transmitted 0 packets
>
>
> Output of sh link-aggregation:
> Long timeout: 90, default: 90
> Short timeout: 3, default: 3
> Port [Sys P] [Port P] [ Key ]
> [Act][Tio][Agg][Syn][Col][Dis][Def][Exp][Ope]
> 1/5 1 1 0 Yes S Agg Syn Col
> Dis Def No Blo
>
>
> So my question is what am I missing here? From
> everything I found, all I
> have to do after setting 1 or more ports into a
> link-aggregation is to add
> the VLAN's as tagged to the ports with the same key. But
> its not allowing
> me to add the tagged vlans.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks
>
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> I've had similar problems before.
> My bookmark takes me to:
>
> http://www.techsneeze.com/create-vlan-trunk-between-cisco-ios-and-foundry-bigiron
>
> Dave
>
> Hi Dave
>
> Thanks for the link, but its only showing how to tag a vlan to the
> port, which what I am currently doing but with the new ciscos and
> adding more fiber between our routers and switches I wanted to be
> able to do link aggregation. I am guessing I can't with this
> system unless I go with Trunk mode.
>
> Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20110107/e36b05d6/attachment.html>
More information about the foundry-nsp
mailing list