[f-nsp] Prefix (dis-)aggregation & prefix (re-)aggregation

chip chip.gwyn at gmail.com
Wed Feb 27 17:31:13 EST 2013


Depending on the topologies you're dealing with.  Something like the IETF's
(Simple) Virtual Aggregation may help:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6769

*I've not tried this, only read through it at some point.

--chip


On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager at wiktel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 23:04 +0100, Alex HM wrote:
> > Everybody mentions that up to 40% of the entire table is rubbish. A
> > lot of people around are bashing the MLs mentioning they re-aggregate
> > these prefixes, but nobody seems to have shared their methodology,
> > tools, algorithm or findings.
>
> If you're asking about quantifying the potential for improvement, I
> think you're looking for the CIDR Report: http://www.cidr-report.org
>
> If you're saying there's some mechanism for re-aggregating these to
> reduce space in my routers' FIBs, I'm not aware of that, but would
> definitely be interested.
>
> --
> Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>



-- 
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20130227/dfdc967e/attachment.html>


More information about the foundry-nsp mailing list