[f-nsp] Mapping QinQ VLANs into VPLS instances

Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr youssef at 720.fr
Thu Oct 2 11:15:05 EDT 2014


Hello,

Anyone ?

Y.



2014-10-01 12:07 GMT+02:00 Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <youssef at 720.fr>:

> Dear Community,
>
> A provider of ours is handing off clients VLANs over a fiber interco using
> QinQ (outer VLAN is for transport on their network and inner VLAN is our
> end client).
>
> We actually terminate this on a Cisco ME but would like to move that to an
> MLXe action as MPLS PE and map VLANs into different MPLS instances.
>
> I wanted to confirm the exact stanza based on what I found in NI5.4 config
> guide :
>
> 1/ Activate QinQ on the provider facing port :
>
> tag-type 9100 ethe X/Y.
>
> I found this section in the guide related to this :
>
> "*Special considerations for dual-tagged endpoints*
> *Before configuring a dual-tagged VPLS endpoint, consider the following:*
>    *• *
>  *The tag protocol identifier (TPID) of the inner VLAN tag must be 0x8100
> be classified as dual-tagged and recognized by dual-tagged endpoints. If
> the TPID is not 0x8100, the packet will be classified as a single-tagged
> packet.*
>     *• *
>  *The TPI*D of the outer VLAN tag must be the port’s configured tag type
> (the default tag type is 0x8100)."
>
>
> 2/ Map client VLAN into the different VPLS instances :
>
> Brocade(config-mpls)#vpls test 10
> Brocade(config-mpls-vpls-test10)#vlan X inner-vlan Y
> Brocade(config-mpls-vpls-test_10-vlan-X-inner-vlan-Y)#tagged Ethernet 2/1
>
> X being SP transport VLAN (outer VLAN) and Y being clustomer VLAN (inner
> VLAN).
>
>
> Does that sound about right to you ?
>
> Thanks for the feedbacks.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
> --
> Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR
>



-- 
Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20141002/8f40d7fb/attachment.html>


More information about the foundry-nsp mailing list