[f-nsp] Where have all the MLX/XMR users gone to?

[George B]

I suppose they could keep some customers if they went with some sort of an
attractive trade up program for X2 cards.  There are a lot of networks out
there that don't take a full table, though, and if you study the CIDR
report you will find several networks out there announcing /16 nets and
even larger with a more specific for every single one of their /24 nets
with an identical AS PATH.  It looks like the more specifics aren't
multi-homed and they are just worried about route hijacking, I suppose.
But if I filter everything longer than the aggregate, I'll never see a
hijacking attempt on one of the more specifics anyway. One can clobber a
lot of unnecessary routes that way but it's still really a game of whack a
mole.   The K series line cards and rack switches from Arista have been
pretty stable so far.  Our old MLX units have really been workhorses over
the years, though. We had one failure of an 8x10G card in the past 3 years.

Extreme never really impressed me at layer 3 anyway and I always saw them
as best at layer 2 inside the data center.  In fact. the place where I
worked way back in the day was an Extreme shop until I needed a rather
simple BGP option (maximum-paths to do multiple paths to a destination) and
they said BGP really wasn't on their road  map and that's when I called
Foundry.  It was Extreme that actually pushed me to Foundry and eventually
Brocade in the first place.  We're in the process of forklifting the last
of the MLX units out this year, though.


On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 4:21 PM Mike Leber <mleber at he.net> wrote:

> Starting several years ago we switched from 1M route cards and chassis
> to 2M route cards and chassis, so those sites will be fine for a while
> (depending on growth).
>
> That left quite a few XMR 8000s and 4000s out there, which we replaced
> with SLX 9540s and 9640s.
>
> We've been not so vocal about it because just like with any brand new
> platform we end up being essentially a free outsourced testing service
> for our router vendors.
>
> At this point I'm happy with the progress (new software versions with
> fixes) enough to post about it.
>
> The 9640s support 4M routes.
>
> Mike.
>
> On 1/28/19 1:31 PM, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I guess most of the users simply replaced their Brocade boxes with
> > Juniper, Cisco or Arista and have no need to use that list here anymore.
> > ;)
> >
> > kind regards
> > Rolf
> >
> >> Is there a new list for Foundry/Brocade/Extreme?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> joe
> >>
> >>
> >> Joe McGuckin
> >> ViaNet Communications
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundry-nsp mailing list
> > foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20190312/836893f8/attachment.html>