[j-nsp] Re: Problem with routing FastEthernet (2)

[Alex Kitschkiruk]

Hi!
I have 2 PC & M20 with 4 Port FE. 
I want only to examine whether rout is functioned. That he routed.
That packages are transferred from one computer to another.
how can I make that better?

On Apr 12, 2005 6:00 PM, juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
<juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to
>         juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         juniper-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..."
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Problem with routing FastEthernet (Alex Kitschkiruk)
>    2. Re: Problem with routing FastEthernet (Michael Loftis)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:29:02 +0200
> From: Alex Kitschkiruk <juniper.m20 at gmail.com>
> Subject: [j-nsp] Problem with routing FastEthernet
> To: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <a859d90505041207297a751ee8 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> Help with juniper junos!!!
> I have received on work old M20 (Junos 4.4) there is only 4Port FastEthernet.
> I can not adjust a configuration that has earned. With most juniper I
> can ping all PC, connected to ports. But here computers each other do
> not see.
> IP PC1 192.168.1.20
> IP PC2 192.168.1.21
> all computers and ports in one network. Tried different reports,
> configurations... Anything...
> I something can is simple do not know... I begin
> Thank you !!!
> 
> version 4.4R3.4;
> system {
>     host-name Jun;
>     syslog {
>         user * {
>             any emergency;
>         }
>         file messages {
>             any notice;
>             authorization info;
>         }
>     }
> }
> interfaces {
>     fe-1/0/0 {
>         unit 0 {
>             family inet {
>                 address 192.168.1.10/24;
>             }
>         }
>     }
>     fe-1/0/1 {
>         unit 0 {
>             family inet {
>                 address 192.168.1.11/24;
>             }
>         }
>     }
>     fe-1/0/2 {
>         unit 0 {
>             family inet {
>                 address 192.168.1.12/24;
>             }
>         }
>     }
>     fe-1/0/3 {
>         unit 0 {
>             family inet {
>                 address 192.168.1.13/24;
>             }
>         }
>     }
>     fxp0 {
>         disable;
>     }
>     lo0 {
>         unit 0 {
>             family inet {
>                 address 127.0.0.1/32;
>             }
>         }
>     }
> }
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:40:05 -0600
> From: Michael Loftis <mloftis at wgops.com>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Problem with routing FastEthernet
> To: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <5848390C09631215F2A816B4@[10.1.2.230]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> --On Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:29 PM +0200 Alex Kitschkiruk
> <juniper.m20 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Help with juniper junos!!!
> > I have received on work old M20 (Junos 4.4) there is only 4Port
> > FastEthernet. I can not adjust a configuration that has earned. With most
> > juniper I can ping all PC, connected to ports. But here computers each
> > other do not see.
> > IP PC1 192.168.1.20
> > IP PC2 192.168.1.21
> > all computers and ports in one network. Tried different reports,
> > configurations... Anything...
> > I something can is simple do not know... I begin
> > Thank you !!!
> 
> Uhm....Unless all the PCs are connected to the same switch, as is all the
> interfaces of the Juniper, this setup will just not work.  The PCs will all
> believe that they're local to eachother and on the same LAN segment, if
> they're not they won't find eachother via ARP.  Not sure what your'e trying
> to accomplish by having four interfaces in the same subnet, but I doubt
> it's what you want.
>