[j-nsp] Juniper box equivalent to GSR

[Saku Ytti]

On (2005-10-19 09:00 -0500), Jack Parks wrote:

> I have found that the Cisco 12410 and the M320 are similar in price. 
> M40e is a bit cheaper.  The main cost difference has been in the
> maintenance (Cisco has per line card maint.).  With the new SIP/SPA
> configuration, the GSRs are becoming more flexable and less expensive,
> compared to traditionaly configured GSRs with engine-X cards.

 Juniper stats has some history, so there are gotcha's and amount
of them are steadily increasing. It's quite inevitable.
 Like invalid PIC combination, need for E-FPC or FPC, do you need
PIC with or without QPP or even for real ancient IPI.
 However if you shop new GSR or new M/T box, it should be pretty
straightforward for both. Granted that M/T today is superior 
in edge features.

-- 
  ++ytti