[j-nsp] LSP types in M-Series
Piotr Marecki
peter at mareccy.org
Tue Sep 6 10:01:21 EDT 2005
>
> What I think that should be possible to setup with Juniper NEs:
> [1]. E-LSP: setting up non-TE tunnels with LDP carrying multiple
> traffic classes (excluding guaranteed bandwidth which requires TE)
> [2]. E-LSP: setting up TE tunnels with RSVP-TE carrying multiple
> traffic classes (including guaranteed bandwidth)
> [3]. L-LSP: setting up TE tunnels with RSVP-TE carrying a single
> traffic class (including guaranteed bandwidth)
>
> Doubts:
> a) If I understood well, Juniper is only able to setup [2] with
> multiclass LSPs. If this is true, it is highly limiting, as [2] can
> only traverse Juniper NEs. Can you confirm this?
Juniper RSVP-TE implementation is mostly compatible with Cisco IOS ,
exlcuding
topic such as DS-TE , Fast-reroute ( one-to-one protection ). Notice however
that
things may change when considering IOS-XR.
>
> b) I am not sure if it is possible to setup [3] with Juniper M-Series
> NEs. I read about classifiers, forwarding classes and policies, but Im
> not yet sure if this mechanisms can be used to split a VLAN's traffic
> according to the 802.1p traffic classes, and forward them to different
> l2circuits. Does anybody knows if [3] can be setup this way? (or any
> other way)
>
You can classify packets based on 802.1p and forward them to different LSP
with class based forwarding
( doesn't have to be DS-TE , works also with normal TE) - works great on
E-FPC. But it is not different l2circuit - y
ou can choose LSP but not l2circuit since logical interface can be assigned
to only one l2circuit
regards
Piotr Marecki
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Best Regards,
> Pedro Fortuna
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list