[j-nsp] VPLS tunnel LSP establishment

[Monika M]

Thanks for the response.
In this case, should I configure the BGP peer address (for l2vpn signaling)
also as loopback address?
(Since tunnel LSP association will be based on the BGP discovered peer
address. Not sure whether tunnel LSP will be searched for the nexthop field
in the L2VPN NLRI or BGP identifier in the packet.

Regards,
Monika


On 8/2/07, Tomasz Szewczyk <tomeks at man.poznan.pl> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In my opinion it is much better to use router ID (loopback). You can
> experience some problems when using interface address if it goes down. I
> assume you have redundant connections/paths between PE1 and PE2.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tomek
>
> Monika M pisze:
> > site1---PE1 ----- P1-----------P2-----------(x)-PE2----site2
> >
> > I have BGP peering between PE1-PE2 for having L2VPN service.
> > L2VPN configuration steps mandate configuration of tunnel LSP
> establishment.
> > Should I have an LSP for the PE2's interface address x or PE2's router
> ID.
> >
> > TIA
> > Monika
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Tomasz Szewczyk
> Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
> e-mail: tomeks at man.poznan.pl
>
> fax: +48 61 8525954
>
>