[j-nsp] VPLS tunnel LSP establishment

Rafał Szarecki rszarecki at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 15:13:20 EDT 2007


One comment. ROUTER ID can be, in theory, 4 bytes whch are NOT adress of any
interface. Sure best practice and common approche is to have RID==loopback
IP. But this is not mandatory.

In this generalized case LSP should be established to routable adress.
Otherwise BGP will noyt be able to make recursive lookup, as RID do not
necesery exist in routing table.

2007/8/2, Erdem Sener <erdems at gmail.com>:
>
> Monika,
>
> I would say establishing neighborships, tunnels etc. with router
> id's/loopbacks is generally a good idea, unless you need to otherwise
> for a very good reason.
>
> Doing so should not only let you easily use alternate paths between
> your P/PE routers as mentioned before but also keep 'clean'
> configurations.
>
> Cheers,
> Erdem
>
> On 8/2/07, Monika M <monika.vpls at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the response.
> > In this case, should I configure the BGP peer address (for l2vpn
> signaling)
> > also as loopback address?
> > (Since tunnel LSP association will be based on the BGP discovered peer
> > address. Not sure whether tunnel LSP will be searched for the nexthop
> field
> > in the L2VPN NLRI or BGP identifier in the packet.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Monika
> >
> >
> > On 8/2/07, Tomasz Szewczyk <tomeks at man.poznan.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In my opinion it is much better to use router ID (loopback). You can
> > > experience some problems when using interface address if it goes down.
> I
> > > assume you have redundant connections/paths between PE1 and PE2.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Tomek
> > >
> > > Monika M pisze:
> > > > site1---PE1 ----- P1-----------P2-----------(x)-PE2----site2
> > > >
> > > > I have BGP peering between PE1-PE2 for having L2VPN service.
> > > > L2VPN configuration steps mandate configuration of tunnel LSP
> > > establishment.
> > > > Should I have an LSP for the PE2's interface address x or PE2's
> router
> > > ID.
> > > >
> > > > TIA
> > > > Monika
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tomasz Szewczyk
> > > Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
> > > e-mail: tomeks at man.poznan.pl
> > >
> > > fax: +48 61 8525954
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>



-- 
Rafał Szarecki JNCIE-M/T, JNCIP-E
+48602418971


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list