[j-nsp] L2VPN Across MX480

[Joe Soricelli]

David-

Yeah, I guess done details are in order. Sent the first email in a  
hurry.

The unit is set for vlan 572 and encap vlan-ccc. The physical is set  
with encap flexible-ethernet-services since vlan 4000 us being used as  
an IP interface.

-joe

On Feb 11, 2009, at 7:46 PM, "David Ball" <davidtball at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Using 'encapsulation ethernet-ccc' on your MX ints for transparency ?
>
> David B
>
>
> 2009/2/11 Joseph Soricelli <joe at proteus.net>:
>> All-
>>
>> Got a simple L2VPN setup with some 7609 as CE and MX480 (9.2R3) as  
>> PE (no P
>> boxes).
>>
>> 7609----MX480-1----MX480-2----7609
>> CE           PE                 PE               CE
>>
>>
>> L2VPN comes up with no issues. In troubleshooting some intermittent  
>> ping and
>> L3 issues from the 7609 side I notice that the switches do not see  
>> each
>> other via CDP, nor to they seem to be seeing each other via STP.
>>
>> It hasn't been THAT long since I was doing one of these last but  
>> I'll be
>> darned if I can recall this specific tidbit. So, am I crazy, or  
>> should those
>> packets be passed through the L2VPN just fine?
>>
>> As a side note, I think the problem might actually be on the 7609  
>> side since
>> I see output packet stats on the PE but no inbound packet stats on  
>> the CE.
>> But, I gotta make sure my STP/CDP assumption is correct before I  
>> start
>> throwing stones! ;-)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>>
>> Joseph Soricelli
>> JNCIE #14/ CCIE #4803
>> 703-980-3999
>> joe at proteus.net
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>