[j-nsp] EX4200 1000baseT SFP unsupported in 9.4
Leigh Porter
leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com
Sat Feb 14 18:54:33 EST 2009
Hi,
These seems to be a common issue here with SFPs working in one rel and
suddenly not in the next rel. This really sucks quite a lot, why is this
happening?
Rather than ask if there is a supported SFP for this release/hardware, I'd
like to know why SFPs that worked fine suddenly break with a point software
upgrade!
Any response from Juniper?
--
Leigh
On 14/02/2009 22:42, "Ruslan A. Magomedov" <magpack at retn.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I saw the same after upgrading from 9.2R2.15 to 9.3R2.8 and have not
> tried later releases yet
>
> Switch stopped detecting two SFP-SX installed in 4x GE SFP module
> I do not know what brand they were
>
> PIC 1 REV 03A 711-021270 AR0208112594 4x GE SFP
> Xcvr 0 NON-SFP XGS00206 UNKNOWN
> Xcvr 1 NON-SFP XGS00208 UNKNOWN
> Xcvr 2 m> NON-JNPR H22L935 SFP-LX10
> Xcvr 3 r NON-JNPR H22L933 SFP-LX10
>
> Best regards,
> Ruslan
>
> Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
>>> Is that an official SFP bought from juniper?
>>>
>>> Perhaps they have decided that any SFP NOT from them will no longer
>>> be allowed to work due to it not having a magic number in its
>>> memory stored on the SFP.
>> That was my concern. I believe I will get a Juniper branded 1000baseT
>> SFP and try the 9.4 upgrade again. I was surprised that a Cisco brand
>> 10GBASE-LR XFP continued to work while all my generic SFP-Ts failed to
>> establish any link.
>>
>> I had hoped one of the Juniper list readers might comment on this.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list