[j-nsp] BGP policy-options policy-statement

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday 21 October 2009 03:51:38 pm Onam Rubio wrote:

> Hi experts,
>
> I have an issue, I reject my private prefix-list but my
> BGP policy keep sending my private prefix-list.

Prefix lists in JUNOS work like route filters with the 
'exact' keyword applied.

That means the prefixes you're matching in the prefix-list 
are the only ones that would get filtered. All other 
prefixes that don't match those in the prefix-list are 
processed by the default term, i.e., longer subnets of each 
prefix specified in your prefix-list.

Also, prefix-lists are evaluated slightly different in JUNOS 
than route-filters.

Would suggest using a route filter and matching upto /32.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20091021/51771c45/attachment.bin>