[j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

Stevanus stevanus at datacomm.co.id
Thu Sep 10 04:28:45 EDT 2009

Sorry for a little bit OOT. So suppose I configure bgp community 
attributes for all routers instead of all EBGP peering routers as 
required in the exam, then I won't lose any points?

- Stevanus -

Stefan Fouant wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Hoogen <hoogen82 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> But since this was in the M-Series... and I would assume when they
>> mentioned
>> "permit four archived copies that will be no larger than 128K"
>> The solution should have been "archive size 128k files 4" and not just left
>> as default. Maybe there was some error in printing. Is there any loss of
>> points in overdoing anything... In this case I believe I am just setting
>> the
>> values without caring for the defaults.
>> -Hoogen
> Hoogen,
> You would not lose points for overdoing anything.  The exam is graded on
> overall functionality.  If you happen to take advantage of system defaults
> and manage to save yourself some typing than great, but otherwise, when in
> doubt, spelling it out won't count against you.
> --
> Stefan Fouant
> Stay the patient course.
> Of little worth is your ire.
> The network is down.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> .


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list