[j-nsp] Experience with J series
Chris Kawchuk
juniperdude at gmail.com
Thu Sep 24 10:16:34 EDT 2009
> The purpose is to build a mission-critical Internet access with two
> ISP (one
> on each box running full table) and have a VRRP fault tolerance and
> with a
> small budget. It is not for pushing huge traffic, I expect around 1
> to 3
> Mbit average and some rare peaks at 8 - 10 Mbit during backup
> timeframes.
No Problem. J2350's are capable of this easily. e/iBGP with full
tables, VRRP on the inside interface.
Processing 8-10mbit/sec would hardly "sweat" the box.
> The features I will be using are firewall (< 30 ACLs), BGP, OSPF
> (both IPv4
> and IPv6) and maybe one VPN tunnel + QoS (?).
Yep. 30 ACL's with no issues (assuming straightforward things). Full
BGP Tables, OSPF area 0.0.0.0 inside, QoS, IPSEC.
> According to the technical datasheet, this gear supports 1 GB of
> DRAM and
> handle a maximum ~ 300k BGP routes.
I've seen much more in 1 Gb of RAM.; however 300k routes is fine for
the global routing table. (which is ~290k or so). You'd have room-to-
spare.
> I have seen in some lists that these models now can be upgraded to 2
> GB of
> DRAM with just no issue. Some people report having had successful
> experience
> handling 500k routes with these littles gears.
Yes. I've worked with J4350's and J6350's with 2 Gb of RAM, holding 2
complete eBGP tables each and an iBGP table. for a total of 800k
routes. Also seen it (by misconfiguration) hold 1.2 Million routes in
BGP/inet.0.
> I am just looking after some experience with them in this kind of
> environment. By the way, does this box include any GUI software to
> maintain
> firewall ACLs?
Full GUI supported (web-Gui on the box) - however, as always, the
power is in the command line. JunOS is easy to use, easy to learn, and
"makes sense" from a command-line configuration perspective.
- Chris.
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list