[j-nsp] Need suggestions..
Kevin Wormington
kworm at sofnet.com
Thu Feb 4 12:18:13 EST 2010
Here is ours on 9.6R1.3, two full feeds, approx 500 logical interfaces
inet.0: 305813 destinations, 604735 routes (305813 active, 0 holddown, 1
hidden)
Routing Engine status:
Temperature 19 degrees C / 66 degrees F
CPU temperature 16 degrees C / 60 degrees F
DRAM 768 MB
Memory utilization 95 percent
Model RE-5.0
Start time 2009-10-02 20:21:49 CDT
Uptime 124 days, 15 hours, 52 minutes, 58
seconds
Last reboot reason Router rebooted after a normal shutdown.
Load averages: 1 minute 5 minute 15 minute
0.00 0.00 0.00
sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
>> We have 4 M7i's with RE-400's and 768M RAM and have never had a problem with
>> taking full routes (we are at 55% memory usage right now).
>>
>> With all of the comments on this topic, should we be worried?
>
> What JunOS version are you running?
>
> This is an M7i with RE-400, a full Internet routing table,
>
> inet.0: 314795 destinations, 629302 routes (314784 active, 0 holddown, 19 hidden)
>
> a handfull of MPLS L3VPNs (around 3K routes here) and a few interfaces,
> running JunOS 9.5R3.7. Memory usage:
>
> Routing Engine status:
> Temperature 33 degrees C / 91 degrees F
> CPU temperature 30 degrees C / 86 degrees F
> DRAM 768 MB
> Memory utilization 94 percent
> Model RE-5.0
>
> I'd say *any* RE-400 box with a full routing table and a recent JunOS
> version is reason for worry. We have been unpleasantly surprised a
> few times (boxes starting to show swap usage).
>
>> Our units push ~200Mbit traffic, so they are nowhere near capacity CPU wise.
>
> Packet forwarding is done in hardware on this platform, the CPU is not
> involved.
>
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list