[j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface

meryem Z meryem_z at hotmail.com
Mon Feb 22 06:11:45 EST 2010


Hello ,

Thanks for your response. But is this valid also for a logical sub-interface ?
does this mean that the bandwidth percentage defined in a scheduler will be calculated based on the bandwidth defined in the shaping rate ?

thank you.




> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a  logical sub-interface
> From: truman at suspicious.org
> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:40:00 +1100
> CC: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> To: meryem_z at hotmail.com
> 
> Scheduling on an interface with a shaping rate that is less than the physical line rate artificially creates congestion when an offered traffic load is greater than the shaping rate. ie. If you have a 5Mbps scheduler and you offer 5.01Mbps you will see queuing... 
> 
> 
> On 22/02/2010, at 8:51 AM, meryem Z wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hello community,
> > 
> > i need to verify Cos scheduler on my logical interface. to do this i need to simulate Congestion conditions. 
> > The question is : how to congestion a logical sub-interface without impacting the physical interface. is it possible to set a bandwidth limit for the sub-interface?
> > 
> > 
> > thank you.
> > 
> > Regards.
> > 
> > 		 	   		  
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec la protection anti-spam performante de Microsoft
> > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > 
> 
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec la protection anti-spam performante de Microsoft
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list