[j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface

[meryem Z]

hello ,

this is a geat thing for congestion simulation. is there any juniper document confirming this ?

thank you.


> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] congestioning a  logical sub-interface
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:24:50 +0530
> From: raghavap at juniper.net
> To: meryem_z at hotmail.com; truman at suspicious.org
> CC: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> 
> Yes, it's valid for logical sub-interface also.
> 
> You can apply the shaping rate on logical interface, and offer the
> traffic load greater than the shaping rate to create congestion.
> 
> Of course, the bandwidth percentage defined in a scheduler will be
> calculated based on the bandwidth defined in the shaping rate.
> 
> Thanks,
> Raghu
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of meryem Z
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 4:42 PM
> To: truman at suspicious.org
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface
> 
> 
> Hello ,
> 
> Thanks for your response. But is this valid also for a logical
> sub-interface ?
> does this mean that the bandwidth percentage defined in a scheduler will
> be calculated based on the bandwidth defined in the shaping rate ?
> 
> thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a  logical sub-interface
> > From: truman at suspicious.org
> > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:40:00 +1100
> > CC: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > To: meryem_z at hotmail.com
> > 
> > Scheduling on an interface with a shaping rate that is less than the
> physical line rate artificially creates congestion when an offered
> traffic load is greater than the shaping rate. ie. If you have a 5Mbps
> scheduler and you offer 5.01Mbps you will see queuing... 
> > 
> > 
> > On 22/02/2010, at 8:51 AM, meryem Z wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Hello community,
> > > 
> > > i need to verify Cos scheduler on my logical interface. to do this i
> need to simulate Congestion conditions. 
> > > The question is : how to congestion a logical sub-interface without
> impacting the physical interface. is it possible to set a bandwidth
> limit for the sub-interface?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > thank you.
> > > 
> > > Regards.
> > > 
> > > 		 	   		  
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec la protection anti-spam
> performante de Microsoft
> > > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > > 
> > 
>  		 	   		  
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec la protection anti-spam performante
> de Microsoft
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec la protection anti-spam performante de Microsoft
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969