[j-nsp] J series users bitten by the massive memory useincrease with flow mode add, please file jtac cases.
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Fri Jul 23 13:47:46 EDT 2010
On Friday, July 23, 2010 06:43:11 am Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
> In theory there isn't necessarily anything wrong with
> this idea... But in practice JUNOS-ES is still very
> buggy and can't be turned into a complete replacement
> for the original JUNOS on the J-series. People don't
> like it when a product that they bought for a certain
> purpose gets pulled out from under them with no
> workaround or compensation, that seems to be the bottom
> line point that Juniper is missing.
They certainly could have learned from the Cisco 6500 vs.
7600 BU fiasco. Oh, that is a mess, and an awesome case
study :-).
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100724/dc6a5f7f/attachment.bin>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list